Post

Another thought on the Bluesky discourse: Bluesky on its absolute worst, most sanctimonious, most "I think you'll find" day has NOTHING on TikTok comment sections/stitches. But TikTok is growing well. To me, that suggests general user utility/attractiveness may be a bigger issue here.

TikTok is growing well despite the fact that if you post about the nice flowers your boyfriend bought you, the top three comments will be folks telling you that he's cheating, that daily roses are the bare minimum, or that you've set women back 80 years by following patriarchal norms in gifts.

What drove a lot of the "content creators" off Twitter more than its owners politics was his decision to render it useless for outgoing links. Musk made it very difficult to impossible to promote anything on his site. It was utility as much as ideology.

At the moment, an active challenge for Bluesky (in my opinion) is that it's a website that encourages hot-takes but does yet have a critical mass of rapid fact content to respond to. Like, there's a reason half the threads on here start with an X screenshot. That can be fixed though!

6 reposts72 likes

For example…

Anders Puck Nielsen@anderspucknielsen.dk

Case in point. @phillipspobrien.bsky.social has over 50K subscribers on Bluesky, so it's not like he's hard to find here. Yet people still screengrab his posts from X. 🤯 Here is the Bluesky link, btw: bsky.app/profile/phil...