Post

Great piece by @xriskology.bsky.social on how the effective altruism cult has helped destroy actual philanthropy - with dangerous and deadly results for many people in need:

Nick Beckstead, noted longtermist and "effective altruist,” just comes out and says it: "But it now seems more plausible to me that saving a life in a rich country is substantially more important than saving a life in a poor country, other things being equal."

I think this is unfair. bsky.app/profile/meas...

Indeed, 2013 dissertation says this: "To use an example from chapter 1, ripple from saving lives in poor countries may be substantially smaller than the ripple effects of saving lives in rich countries, though this consideration shouldn’t normally get much weight in deciding which lives to save."

This is also written in the voice of a bloodless ghoul. Why can’t you see that?

That's written in the voice of someone writing a dissertation in philosophy.

I’m fully aware. So what?

No, I poked around your website and I do not believe you are a stupid person. (Again, kudos.) I was not aware of your philosophical background (why would I be?) My point stands. Isn't basically all philosophy in the English analytic tradition cold sounding in part? Or do I misunderstand you?