Post

Pam Bondi brought a document to the Judiciary Committee today that had my search history of the Epstein files on it. The DOJ is spying on members of Congress. It’s a disgrace and I won’t stand for it.

1K reposts2.9K likes

I just knew when I read that reps were invited to visit DOJ offices to view this info that there would be dirty tricks involved. I guess we now know what. At least you all weren’t kidnapped and locked in a gulag somewhere.

She’s doing her job as best she can, but she is one person. The question to ask is, what more can concerned citizens do fight this regime? The answer: Get more people involved to write, call, protest, create civil disobedience. We seriously need your voice and many, many more.

I understand that. But when a member of congress says they aren't going to take it anymore, I want to know what they will do. The old ways no longer work. The gop doesn't follow rules and norms. They also seem to be pretty good at ignoring laws they don't like.

The democratic party must pick one fight at a time and fight it with everything you have. Right now trump keeps throwing balls in the air and you are chasing all of them. You also need to appeal to mainstream media to treat his insanity the way they treated Biden's age.

The surveillance is why their viewing was restricted to terminals controlled by DOJ. This now adds everyone involved in setting that up to list people who need to be investigated in connection w Epstein. 😡

Pam Bondi had one of these printouts for each Democrat congress member who searched the Epstein files. Congress must investigate if this surveillance is also occurring against citizens who are searching the Epstein files on the Department of Justice website.

The Gestapo is using sophisticated surveillance cameras with facial recognition of protesters and placing them in a database listed as domestic terrorists. So they're building a database of who to go after next!

Any written authorization to retrieve and publicly deploy a member’s search history for use in a hearing? Judging from Bondi's behaviour today, I'm going to say, No. She is such a disgraceful pedantic sycophant. (South Park has her #) No doubt she will be in a lot more hearings post-midterms

If a congressional rep, while looking into the EPSTEIN FILES EPSTEIN FILES EPSTEIN FILES, comes up with any dirt, the DOJ will accuse them of surfing for child porn. It's one reason they're being spied upon by the DOJ. To their sick and twisted minds it would be a gotcha'.

not that you or your staff ever bother to read the responses to your posts, @jayapal.house.gov , let alone stoop to respond to us plebes... but HOW are you "not going to put up with" bondi's utter lack of regard for decorum or decency? or her blatant disregard for the US code and constitution?

Hey Congresswoman, during the GQP clown show today one R said something about a Bill they are going to pass that calls for expanding the court. I guess it goes along with the new voter bill that discriminates against married women

Some Republicans have trouble distinguishing "spying" from "law enforcement investigation". Here's the difference: If the authorities are pursuing a crime, like the attack on the Capitol or foreign influence in U.S. elections, then it's an investigation. If there's no crime, then it's spying.

The times I have called the people elected to represent me and talked to someone, I came away with the distinct feeling they were not fully aware of the extent of the Epstein files situation(?)… 😳🚨‼️

If I call my congressperson and talk to their staff and they were to look up stuff about me, address or information on their computers there, are their searches going to be tracked and monitored and made into a neat little list for one of bondi’s henchpeople? 🤬

Why are the DEMS recognizing Johnson's comment that the spying of congressional members' keystrokes is "inappropriate" at all? It's outrageously illegal, unconstitutional, and indictable. I'm so tired of the DEMS' capitulation to the slightest acknowledgement nod from a deceitful GOP member.

This is exactly why we have had Independent Counsel's i the past: to steer clear of the interference and conflicts of interest between Congress and the Executive. Never more clear that this situation that an IC is appropriate, warranted. The Executive Branch is essentially a criminal enterprise.

What will the consequences be? A letter registering your dissent is a joke It seems the American Constitution isn't worth the paper it is written on

Good job today. Pam Blondi is a real piece of work. Small point but you said "Let the record reflect that everyone has raised their hand" but it should be HER hand. Expressly "her" bc this is a war on women, as you know. To hell with patriarchy 😠

Typical typical Democrat. Her response is to send a letter. Perhaps Schumer can help draft it. Jeffries may be able to help wordsmith it. What a pathetic, sorry group of wusses. Basically asking how far they should bend over. She should SUE for $1B.

Pam is one sick puppy. Congress enacted a law to make those files available so everyone could access them. People should access them because they document some awful, deplorable behavior that must be brought to light. I'd be angry at Congress members who had not searched the files

🚨 Trump is compromised by Netanyahu. 🚨 🚨 Trump is compromised by Netanyahu. 🚨 Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe confirms Netanyahu is blackmailing Trump: “American government is trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein was one of their tools to trap them.”

Do US a favor - Give them something to talk about: 👉🏼 get to the bottom of the “jerky” codeword… If it’s what we believe it is - the whole ballgame changes. Right wingers get mad if a democrat says “eat the rich” re: taxes - while the rich may be eating people - literally. Like frfr -

Ansolitely appalling. The DoJ is spending their time investigating members of Congress who are trying to hold the DoJ accountable, instead of spending their time actually pursuing investigations aimed at the Epstein predator/money launderer/security threat networks.

Bondi had you and others come in early to use the 4 available computers. They issue usernames and passwords, don't tell you, necessitating to log in for you. Then the scum track your actions movements so they have time to prepare the files for Bondi's hearing on each of the computer users! Wow.

"Spying," no. Or at least I doubt it. Reviewing the search history of the computer terminal you were using to review redacted Epstein documents, apparently yes. Both are horrific, but the latter was predictable.

Astounding. And the techs that put spyware on those machines. And the staff that pulled that binder together should be held accountable. Fired. Shamed. Ostracized and if appropriate jailed. (And certainly the vile AG)

If you think that is crazy. Think about the binder she had on representative and how long it took her to compile it and keep it together. Geez maybe if she work that hard on the Epstein stuff.