Post

Around this same time, a utility company recruiting at my law school was asking female students about their relationship status & reproductive plans. 1st & 2nd students were too dumbfounded to respond, but warned #3, who told him such questions were illegal. 1/

He handwaved that away. "I don't know about all that EEOC stuff". As an interviewer, he bloody well should have, of course. He was reported to the placement office, which banned him. Not sure if any action was ever taken against the employer.

Between this and the framing of "firms are willing to comply with rules against discrimination to avoid losing recruiting privileges or getting a bad reputation among top students," there is a LOT about this article that has aged poorly

Sylvia Chi 齊思涵@sylviachi.bsky.social

This is remarkable on its own, but also: "Since then the debate over the Washington firm's actions have raged across Yale's campus with letters and petitions being posted on bulletin boards like wall posters in Peking." ???

During two separate firm callback interviews I was asked about my wife’s ethnicity and my religious beliefs. One of the firms apologized profusely (via phone call from the managing partner) when I called them out on it. The other…didn’t care.