Post

The Atlantic quotes a dodgy corporate "think tank" (I routinely see them make bogus claims on broadband) that insists that people should love having an AI data center in their backyard, because the low latency means innovators will flock to the neighborhood, which is an outright lie

81 reposts303 likes

No one using an LLM is using it for low-latency decision making. If you care about latency you're streaming games or you're a high frequency trader, and none of those are terrible aggressive growth industries that have anything to do with what we're calling AI this month.

this idea that a new local data center means a ton of local jobs and innovation is one of the biggest lies tech corporations and their assorted mouthpieces are telling communities (including tribal) to get them to sign off on their unregulated energy hoovering ambitions

nytimes.comBig Tech Is Now Targeting Native American Land for Massive Data CentersThe data center boom has roiled communities across the country, but on Native land, a Big Tech push for quick approvals has pitted the need for development against a history of exploitation.

It is but it’s such an obvious and easily disproved lie that I wonder why it works. Either local governments are unbelievably gullible or they’re happy to use that as cover for the real reason they’re supporting it.

innovators aren't moving to the middle of nowhere to develop new innovations because an additional 5ms of latency is irrelevant. And once they've built a giant fenced off energy hoovering campus they'll distance themselves from the community and the only jobs will be outsourced janitorial

I don't know how you could look at U.S. corporate history and determine any of this works out particularly well for blue collar human beings (especially in tribal territories), yet once again here we are

the "progressive policy institute" cited by the Atlantic (unchallenged) claims to be a "center left" pro-competition think tank, but they're covertly funded by a lot of shitty companies (like AT&T) and routinely argue against stuff like corporate oversight or community-owned broadband

techdirt.comThe Broadband Industry Pretends To Be Worried About Your Soaring Bill In Attempt To Undermine Net NeutralityOn the heels of Obama’s surprise support of Title II-based net neutrality rules last month, we noted that the broadband industry’s anti-Title II talking points (primarily that it will k…

and like cruise ships there's nothing stopping them from shipping in even cheaper overseas labor to do the few jobs that are required once the data center is built, especially in a country with no working regulators

Yeah, sure: a bunch of weird AI-bros and vibe coders driving up the cost of living is CERTAINLY worth the constant noise of a slapdash data center chugging away 24/7…

Fair. What is especially ridiculous data centers is that most of the simple concerns for neighborhoods could be addressed by regulating noise/light pollution, power/water usage, etc. But American legislators are allergic to that because voters are brainwashed to reflexively reject all regulation.