Post

These numbers signify justice in my world. 1 hegseth is a moron. The chevalier/La Fayette bloodline was the only surviving members of the Templar knights. 13 represents justice. 11 represents disclosure. Trump hates the number 13. To him its unlucky. 13 moon calendar every month has a Friday13

All this leap year bs is to steal a missing penny per hour from every human being on this calendar by an unseen cult that needs dismantled . Is no leap year. We eventually produce a flower of life orbital patern that makes life possible on this planet. This is one based on this 12 month calendar

A day begins at 0.01 seconds not day 1. 13 moons aka months. 28 days each. 13×28=364 beginning at day 0.01 No need for a leap year and every moonth should have a Friday 13th. The church banned this because 13 is associated with the genocide of my ancient family who was gnostic. And balanced

That is exactly how you make every one of Trump's frivolous lawsuits go away. But one hopes the BBC turns around and sues Trump for the frivolous lawsuit he brought and makes him pay all their cost plus damages.

Of course he will, it's a behavior pattern. He tried to squeeze them for money, they refused, and it's not his turf. He'll move on to something else. That what predators do.

The legal system is basically just a high-stakes game of "Who can summon the most inconvenient person to a room" until someone finally runs out of excuses. We've reached the 'subpoena as a power move' era of governance.

Yeah, his brilliant legal team must have forgot to explain discovery to him. The depos are the least of it, wait till they get a court order for documents, electronic and otherwise. If he pulls out I bet they hit him with a nuisance suit.

Yet another Epstein distraction (hopefully) collapses under the weight of disclosure, transparency, truth etc. What now? His pedo friends in the Supreme Court or just a yellow-livered retreat & silence, with his enormous willy hanging disconsolate between his legs..? www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

bbc.co.ukTrump ordered to answer questions under oath in BBC lawsuitTrump is suing the BBC over an episode of Panorama that edited together two different sections of a speech he gave in 2021.

BBC giving the ICC, Epstein Survivors, and the international community more evidence for US OBSTRUCTION CHARGES, among many others, like weaponization and extortion.

Lavonne@loveon9.bsky.social

And on Monday, the BBC's attorneys separately filed a notice describing the "matters of national importance" that Trump cited to support his unavailability for an Oct. 16 deposition in his own $10 billion lawsuit which "[n]o one forced [him] to file[.]"

Yep .. he doesn't want to open his books (financials) to the court, docket and public .. why? .. because it's chock full of financial fraud and fuckery for ALL to see .. and thus shall T.A.C.O. .. and yeth .. he stepped into his own shit with that lawsuit . .

Bullies ALWAYS cower when confronted with accountability. It's unfortunate that the MAGAT Congress is too fearful and impotent to do the same, as is required by their oath of office and job requirements.

BBC won’t let him drop the case, and has to give his deposition and produce documents just like any other litigant. Fuck him. Shoulda thought about bit before filing smart ass suit. By the end, he’s gonna end up paying bbc legal fees and costs

He thought the BBC would fold like the other US news agencies and just settle with him. He didn't know that the BBC is a public institution and they are literally forbidden from settling.

A lot of people in the UK do not like the BBC. It's widely considered to be a mouth piece of the British government and establishment. I can though, safely say that I haven't met anyone here that isn't backing the BBC.

It seems likely Trump would do that. He knows he would merely supply the court with BS and I suspect he realizes he could be caught in the act.

He said he was damaged personally and financially by the BBC. I understand the BBC wants his financials brought into it. To see his books and see how much he was financially damaged. Of course he will drop it.

Strange how the BBC humbly reported this when Trump started proceedings but hasn't said a word about the man's pathetic machinations in trying to weasel out of it ever since.

It's a no lose situation for Donny Dumbfuck, he delayed and obfuscated, for roughly a year. Now he will drop his lawsuit, while the taxpayers are on the hook for his legal defense. And he will merely move on to the next manufactured crisis.

Due to the sensitive nature of the inquiries posed, it is imperative that the individual respond with complete transparency, as any misstep could potentially lead to self-incrimination. 1/

Besides, we all know he is a volatile individual who can be a loose cannon on the stand. God only knows what will come out of his mouth and self incriminate himself or others!!

Oh please, can BBC then countersue for defamation and lawyers fees? Can we then get Jack to defend their original article? Maybe get the word 'insurrection' in a court record for infamy? At least throw us that crumb.

No way can this end well for Trump. I CAN'T WAIT. p.s. Katie! You sound like you're coming down with something. Simpkins Travel Tins...can't recommend them enough for throat issues!

Republican Regime wanted to LiveStream Firing Squad Executions ...so I guess they'll also want to LiveStream Trumps Lawsuit against the BBC...pay to view? <sarcasm>

Precedent. In Clinton v. Jones (1997), the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a sitting president has no immunity from civil lawsuits over unofficial conduct, which let Paula Jones’s sexual harassment suit proceed. Clinton was deposed in that case on January 17, 1998.

Of course he will. No lawyer in their right mind would allow Trump to be put under oath. It would be a race between his heart and head to see which one exploded first.

He was so spoiled having the US outlets cave he took his clown circus international. The BBC doesn't play. He should be forced to follow through with it, the litigious creep