Post

Tell me if I'm wrong, but I feel journalists are on Twitter because the news breaks there, and the news breaks there because journalists are on twitter.

Blueski for Dudeski!

How awesome is that!! 🥰

The news is better here. No one actually needs to be on X.

Just read your article in NYT. The more journalists use blurb posts from Blue Sky instead of X and the more online news allows you to share directly to Blue Sky, the more they will not have to be on X!

my personal answer is that AI stuff still happens there

Sources, is the legitimate answer. But being there != being as engaged.

Hey @nytimes.com how about a direct link to gift articles to @bsky.app ? www.nytimes.com/2024/11/22/t...

I’d argue that journalists need to get off of X/Threads with expediency. The longer they remain, the longer non-sensical, bad faith arguments about what is reality will perpetuate. Just get off of the platform and let them argue amongst themselves until it completely implodes.

Just delete your Twitter. You won’t regret it.

How is it "encouraging discourse" by assuming it can only happen on the platforms (Threads and X) that are ruled by the whims of two eccentric billionaires rather than on the platform that forthrightly wishes to empower the individual user? I find that befuddling?

There’s some poetic justice in the fact that Bluesky was a spinoff project of Twitter, and now it’s starting to take on its former parent which turned nasty or is it just a plot line of Star Wars? 🤔

Do they need to be on X though? When the owner of the company actively influences an election, posting supports him. Leaving is the right answer.

Hi Kevin 👋🏼 Newbie (aka, newskie?) here. I just finished reading your Bluesky piece on NYT (Bluesky, Smiling at Me). It’s quite good. Happy to follow you. 🦋

Kevin, when you interviewed the doctor about ChatGPT diagnostic skills, you should have had him explain how doctors should use better prompting techniques. Also if they doubt GPT's diagnosis but don't fully reject it, they should consider what additional evidence is needed to confirm or reject.

Welcome to Bsky

I was exiled from X by Bobby Jindal's ads

Your article in today's NYT greatly appreciated Kevin. Nice to see the platform taking off.

And why do journalists still need to spend time on X/Threads? Just for redundancy? To keep one eye on Crazy Town? (Well, maybe that's a good reason.)

Bluesky has reached critical mass in only a handful of topics. The next few days will be interesting to watch whether this platform will be able to retain interest and grow active users or fall back. Hopefully the former.

DO THEY need to be there? Because the algorithms there actively are working against engagement for them. It's amazing how much news I'm getting here vs twitter. And Threads? Fuhgeddaboudit.

You get that at work!

Ohhh I remember texting twitter on my giant nokia webphone lol. Yeah I ditched that hellhole for good awhile ago. Briefly came back to bully magas during the election and shuttered my account the next day

Why do journalists need to be on Xhitter?

Hi Kevin, are you Andy's Theory from Tribel? I'm LadyVotesBlue from Tribel aka Patti. Your page looks awesome! Wow, you already have a large following! Good for you! I am looking for Tribel members? Have you seen any of them? Kind thx