Post

People demanding Zuck be hauled before Congress to explain why No Kings insta was suspended... how would you feel if MAGA GOP hauled MSNow execs to explain why they covered Trump the way they do? Both are editorial choices protected by the First Amendment. If this annoys you...

joshuag

@joshuag.com

The first amendment argument is horseshit as long as they are operating under Section 230.

Mike Masnick

@masnick.com

What? The First Amendment and 230 work hand in hand.

Maria BOO!stillos

@mariabustillos.com

Facebook is evidently committing brand new kinds of crime that will presumably (someday) require new laws to address. I for one would rather hear Zuckerberg questioned about suppressing criticism of DOGE on Facebook (as revealed in his private DMs to Musk in recent court documents)

18/10/26, 4:33 am0 reposts3 likes

Mike Masnick

@masnick.com

That one I think is valid! Because there you have actual clear evidence of suppression at the request of a gov't employee!

Maria BOO!stillos

@mariabustillos.com

It was off his own bat iirc, not in response to a request (in the snippet I read) but yeah