Post

Did the New York Times’ regular headline writers call in sick? I‘d love to see more headlines as direct as this one.

279 reposts1.2K likes

Unfortunately they're more likely to do things like calling the Ramaswamy ad "ruthless" (today's online edition, not sure how to embed a headline without the story). Ruthless can mean a lot of things, including something truthful. But calling an abomination "ruthless" seems a bit too cowardly.

Anyone that can honestly sit back and think about this can see that the Islamic faith is not the threat to this country. It is the Christian Nationalists who have committed more acts of violence in the name of religion. There needs to be a honest discussion on the role of religion in our politics.

I believe they know which way the wind is blowing. I've noticed a lot of news organizations are developing actual positions now that weren't there before. It's not like they all actually grew back bones.

Third eye open people mind control every thought from the rest of us with telepathic magic. Voices in people’s heads? They are other humans on Earth who mind control the rest of us. Look your friends in the eyes. They’re bad at keeping their cover. #endoursuffering

Hold on there. This morning the NYT talked about Anthropic’s IPO while The Guardian revealed that Anthropic accessed Georgia’s voter data.

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta helped amplify Bolsanaro in Brazil over Lula. It is quite evident that Meta is helping amplify Islamophobia and the GOP message. They never take down Islamophobic comments. Right wing influencers push out hate.