Post

And it's made things a lot shittier because my wife has family there and AirBnBs are a lot more expensive when we visit. There's a way to do this without enshittifying services people actually use. Build more housing.

In Port Angeles we had doubled the housing construction rate through prioritizing infill and multi-unit housing construction. But because of the Airbnb market, that new housing wasn't going to more housing: we were losing housing to Airbnb as fast as we were building new housing. "Build more" is BS.

My point is that a model of housing stock that doesn't take into account housing that is lost from the housing stock doesn't accurately reflect what is going on. If we want to increase housing stock, then that is about maintaining existing housing as residences as well as adding new housing.