Pinned
Patrick Siegman
Patrick Siegman
@siegman.biz
Transportation planner and economist. Founder, Siegman & Associates. Formerly Principal & Shareholder at Nelson\Nygaard. LinkedIn: https://tinyurl.com/5cekhrjh
3.7K followers170 following12.5K posts
Patrick Siegman reposted
The video of the parking reform in Latin America webinar by @parkingreform.org and @itdp-hq.bsky.social is now up. Food for thought on how we can all learn from each other and build more momentum on parking reform in many countries. youtu.be/wEaV2cqhsq0?...
What can cities across Latin America teach us about parking reform? Join PRN + ITDP for a conversation with experts from Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico on policy wins, implementation challenges, and demand-management strategies across 12 Latin American cities. Register Today: luma.com/parking-ghg6
What should Lula do with his new term? Take this policy nationwide: “São Paulo is among the largest cities to have completely abolished its costly parking mandates. It is impossible to ignore the precedent set by this enormous city with relatively high car ownership and 12 million people.”
“Goals of São Paulo’s parking reform: The new Strategic Master Plan sought ’to humanize São Paulo and bring employment and housing closer together, rebalancing the city. And to achieve these goals it is necessary to fight idle land, which does not fulfill its social function…’”
“The result was startling: For every 1,000 new mortgages issued through the government programs, there were about 300 additional births the following year.” If you are worried about declining birth rates, you should support more housing.
“A car drove into the Muni tunnel at the Embarcadero on Saturday afternoon, causing San Francisco to end its train service downtown in both directions.” “A car drove…” Gee, was a human involved?
What are the consequences for car drivers who pull stunts like this? S.F. Muni ends downtown train service for night after car drives into tunnel www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/m...
I've long advocated for reforming #CEQA to speed up environmentally-beneficial projects, from bicycle, pedestrian and transit improvements, to apartments near transit. But I'm opposing Prop 45. Many other CEQA reformers are too. Here's why (🎁link):
For those interested, here are my recommendations on California state, Bay Area regional, and San Francisco local ballot measures, including Prop 45.
No on 45: No fast-tracked freeways. 45 shortens environmental review “for projects deemed ‘essential’ — including new highways. While CEQA has, at times, been used to slow or halt housing development, this proposition would streamline many projects that are outright bad for people & the planet.”
Patrick Siegman reposted
Boulder also was an early mover on excellent cycling infrastructure in the 90s and 00s, but paired with strict single-family zoning and parking mins. Housing prices skyrocketed, it became a traffic snarl of commuters, now most famous for ripping out bike lanes: www.denverpost.com/2016/01/17/b...
Davis was a pioneer in adding bike facilities, but it layered them on to auto-oriented zoning that includes strict minimum parking mandates & bans apartments on most land. The resulting housing shortage and parking surplus pushed many workers into long-distance car commutes from other cities.
Davis was a pioneer in adding bike facilities, but it layered them on to auto-oriented zoning that includes strict minimum parking mandates & bans apartments on most land. The resulting housing shortage and parking surplus pushed many workers into long-distance car commutes from other cities.
Had a great talk about my book last night in Davis. One thing I've heard from riders who live in places like Davis—famous for being one of the best biking cities in the US—is that progress has slowed or stopped and they almost wish they weren't held up as a gold standard.
Existing: derelict bank, gas station, parking lots. Proposed: 127 homes. "The project uses Senate Bill 330, which speeds up approvals and limits cities’ ability to block or delay housing. Tiburon, like other wealthy Bay Area towns, has been a no-go development zone for decades, with..."
“Councillor Keith Anderson…said the offer cost the council £1.8m a year, adding that there had been ’no increase in footfall‘ while it was in place. ’People don't come because of free parking, they come because they want to do something,‘ he said.”
Patrick Siegman reposted
For those interested, here are my recommendations on California state and San Francisco local candidates:
“Xavier Becerra is the best candidate to take on the tough fights to build the housing California needs. His opponent, Steve Hilton, is positioning himself as a NIMBY, opposing SB 79 & wrongly claiming there is some kind of ‘war on single family homes.’” We need a housing supporter, not a NIMBY.
Patrick Siegman reposted
Daniel Hess, a professor of urban and regional planning at the U at Buffalo, found in a 2021 study that about half of the new developments built since the city eliminated its parking minimums in 2017 have included fewer parking spaces than were previously required. @reconnectroc.bsky.social
Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. www.nytimes.com/2025/01/12/b...
Patrick Siegman reposted
Daniel Hess was one of Donald Shoup's graduate students in the 1990s. More than 20 years later, Hess had the opportunity to work with his former mentor on one of his final publications. Learn more about 'The Shoup Doctrine' here www.its.ucla.edu/202...
I'll be there, along with many of my co-authors. Join us! November 10: 3-5pm Book Talk (in-person and virtual) 5-7pm Reception The price is right: free.😊
I'll be there, along with many of my co-authors. Join us! November 10: 3-5pm Book Talk (in-person and virtual) 5-7pm Reception The price is right: free.😊
"Please join Ann Cheng Consulting and @parkingreform.org in celebrating the release of The Shoup Doctrine. Donald Shoup (1938–2025) was an American economist and distinguished research professor of urban planning at UCLA who revolutionized urban policy by arguing against free parking and..."
When I lead downtown parking studies in the US, our team routinely finds that off-street parking is underused. It's not uncommon to find them ~45% empty, even at the busiest hour of the busiest day of the week. That's not what I would call a "scarce resource."
"In many U.S. cities, off-street parking costs far more than on-street parking...'Canada and the United States are known for relatively high costs of off-street parking, reflecting the market demand for this scarce resource in downtown areas'” www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/inrix-p...
When the topic is parking, what does it mean to be “conservative?” Is it conservative to remove a costly government mandate, so that individuals can decide for themselves how many spaces they do (or don’t) want to build on their own land? Or, is it conservative to mindlessly maintain the status quo?
Tonight at the Bellevue Council: a debate about whether to abolish parking mandates within a quarter-mile of bus rapid transit stops (the minimum set to be required by state law) or whether to go to a half-mile. Mayor Mo Malakoutian broke the 3-3 tie on this in the more conservative direction.
”The 56-year-old product designer,…later published a video claiming that by exploiting the sign application process, homeowners can effectively reserve curbside parking in front of their properties for a few hundred dollars a month.”
”The 56-year-old product designer,…later published a video claiming that by exploiting the sign application process, homeowners can effectively reserve curbside parking in front of their properties for a few hundred dollars a month.”
For those interested, here are my recommendations on California state and San Francisco local candidates:
“Xavier Becerra is the best candidate to take on the tough fights to build the housing California needs. His opponent, Steve Hilton, is positioning himself as a NIMBY, opposing SB 79 & wrongly claiming there is some kind of ‘war on single family homes.’” We need a housing supporter, not a NIMBY.
And here are my recommendations on CA state, Bay Area regional, and SF local ballot measures (with links to useful voter guides):
Yes on Prop 1. Building more market-rate homes can help with California’s crisis of unaffordable housing, but that's not enough. We also need public funding to support low-income residents in need. The programs funded by this have a track record of success. www.spur.org/voter-guide/...
Before: 6.5 acres of underutilized BART parking lots Approved: 743 homes (70 underway so far)
On Monday, Secretary Xavier Becerra joined Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland), BART Director Barnali Ghosh and BART General Manager Bob Powers for a tour of 70 affordable apartments under construction at the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station.
When Trump tweets, “The ‘suburban housewife’ will be voting for me. They want safety & are thrilled that I ended the long running program where low income housing would invade their neighborhood,” it must be music to the ears of Republican billionaire Marc Andreessen.
My head canon is that Marc Andreessen was driven to madness by this hot button political topic that he even wrote about:
I remain hopeful for better days. We are going to move beyond policies designed to segregate and exclude. We are going to put exclusionary single-family zoning in the dustbin of history, where it belongs.