Post

This law is intended to make it easier to find pet-friendly housing by making it illegal for landlords to limit the breed and/or size of pets that can live in their properties. It will have the opposite effect as landlords adopt blanket "no pets" policies.

◥◤Kriston Capps 250@kristoncapps.bsky.social

I'm squishy when it comes to dogs, I sympathize with the supporters here and waffled over this bill when it was first introduced. But give it just a moment's thought and it seems obvious to me: Landlords who say small dogs are OK will just say no dogs are OK. www.wusa9.com/article/life...

16 reposts179 likes

DC apartments usually seem pretty permissive of dogs in order to attract tenants. It would kind of be a sea change if they went the other way. There’s only one or two management companies that ban pets and kind of treat it as a specificamenity.

While I sympathize with the intentions here, it seems obvious to me that if allowing pets at all means landlords have to allow someone to have a 150+ pound English Mastiff in their studio apartment (with strict limits on pet deposits and pet rent) then landlords are just going to ban pets entirely.

I have a 150lb Newfoundland, and we live in a studio apartment. Giant dogs actually are great apartment dogs because they are extremely lazy. High-energy working dogs (huskies, sheepdogs, etc.) don't belong in apartments.

I have complicated feelings about no weight limits bc the larger the dog the deeper the claw gouges etc. I say this as a large and small dog owner. You’ll find big dogs that are gentle, but give one who’s not 5 min and that’s a $ refinish of the floor and you can only do so many times w/o replacing.

I had a 45 lb dog gouge the enamel of a century-old cast iron tub (my own) bc he didn't want a bath. Well within reason to set a limit.

The most hate I’ve ever gotten on this website was when I pointed out that a bill to end pet rent would likely lead to more landlords not allowing pets at all.