Post

Originalism: make up a new, original, interpretation of the Constitution to benefit rich, white guys.

I don't think the clerks get enough credit. Would love to get an overview of who they are and what makes them tick because research acumen is surely not their forte.

bsky.app/profile/alex...

They’ve set the bar so high, because they’re so high.

‼️

@leahlitman.bsky.social @profmmurray.bsky.social @kateshaw.bsky.social

Oh even that one they ignore the scary bad no no words like “regulated”

Or fluctuate between methodologies depending on the political perspective suited at the moment.

You know... "originalists"

This deserves to be on the next SAT verbal, even though it’s kind of a giveaway.

Spot on. We usually think of Fundamentalism as a theological issue, but there is also a strain of it within the law that has broken containment. Both rely on fear of & hostility to modernity.

Exactly this. Vibes over text every time.

It’s amendable for a reason.

It’s like the Bible.

Small c conservative would.

@jamellebouie.net Since when does @mcsweeneys.net publish articles by serious conservative legal scholars?

Perverted Alito referenced the “ wisdom “ of a 16th century radical Matthew Hale in Dobbs v Jackson -Hale sentenced women to death as witches -this court are NOT in the business of transcending ANYTHING . They are radical , handsomely bribed agents of the most evil forces in the land . Subhumans .

Real power is the power to decide which words matter.