Post

I briefly subscribed to unherd a few years back, figuring that reading a bit of longform would be informative. Yet about half the articles were just like this one. Wordy, contrarian sophistry, stupid beyond belief. So the subscription didn’t last long.

I think the original sin here is to brand your publication as having a contrarian edge. Sure, truth can sometimes be contrarian. But contrarianism, by itself, is just a soap box for tin foil hats speaking, however eloquently, to an audience of tin foil hats.

Everybody gets their shot of “I’m so clever” dopamine, and the speaker gets some money on top. And everyone will leave a little bit dumber.

0 reposts1 like

No replies yet.