Post

The U.S. legal system’s dignity was tested this week by a naked image of Shrek projected on the wall of an Ohio courtroom. The lewd photo of the animated ogre was evidence in a misdemeanor case that questioned the limits of political discourse in the age of the internet.

nyti.msBlogger on Trial: Is a Lewd Image of Shrek Free Speech or Harassment?An Ohio municipal court heard a misdemeanor case that considered the limits of political discourse in the age of the internet.

8 reposts29 likes

This incident highlights the delicate balance between free political discourse and courtroom decorum, prompting a necessary discussion on evidentiary standards in the digital age.

1/ Stepping back from this, and who was on the two sides, I do think personal communications, as opposed to public speech, ought to have some special considerations. For one thing, I ought to be able to tell someone ‘do not contact me’. And if they do anyway,

2/ they should inherently be on thin ice for harassment just from that. I actually do believe everyone should be able to direct that they not be contacted on a personal level by another person, and have it legally stick. I tentatively believe the fact the politician didn’t at first know who the

3/ sender was indicates he must have blocked the journalist’s main phone. It seems unlikely the journalist hadn’t already contacted the politician at many other times, given the whole story. The journalist must have been blocked due to previous interactions. And if

4/ the journalist had instead asked for comment rather than communicating his own comment, I would venture this breach of no contact would plausibly further a public good. Now, I am in no way saying a politician can say ‘do not contact me’ and thereby bar a journalist from

Having completely abandoned any genuine concern for the public interest, #Republican politics in the #MAGA era can certainly be depicted as masturbatory. #TrumpCircleJerk