Post
Also see... 2/n
anw sign here: www.change.org/p/stop-the-h... > In these venues he has repeatedly advanced claims about the supposed cognitive inferiority of Black people , along with broader arguments about the “feminization” of academia and suggestions that eugenic ideas deserve renewed scientific consideration.
He's not in some marginal place or unemployed or anything. > UGent has defended its decision, stating that Cofnas was selected through a "procedurally correct" process that evaluated candidates based on qualifications like publications and expertise. www.brusselstimes.com/2007046/ghen... 3/n
www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/t47r5... Statement of the department. Has been taken offline due to complaint of the prof who hired Cofnas
Europe is super fucking racist, doubt there's more to it than that. m.youtube.com/watch?v=OLkP...
Cofnas was not hired on the ERC grant, but on an internal grant: research.flw.ugent.be/en/projects/...
@erc.europa.eu : the scientific community is waiting for a position if it is a starting grants ?
The document, apart from the procedural and impact focus, rightly raises that a researcher who promotes extraordinary scientific claims (albeit outside journals) against prevaling consensus must present extraordinary evidence. The freedom is to present such evidence,not freedom from presenting it. 3