Post

Also see... 2/n

anw sign here: www.change.org/p/stop-the-h... > In these venues he has repeatedly advanced claims about the supposed cognitive inferiority of Black people , along with broader arguments about the “feminization” of academia and suggestions that eugenic ideas deserve renewed scientific consideration.

He's not in some marginal place or unemployed or anything. > UGent has defended its decision, stating that Cofnas was selected through a "procedurally correct" process that evaluated candidates based on qualifications like publications and expertise. www.brusselstimes.com/2007046/ghen... 3/n

brusselstimes.comGhent University under fire for appointing US philosopher with ties to 'scientific racism'Concerns have been raised about Nathan Cofnas due to his association with controversial "race science."

"How we we, good liberals, stop the jews and muslims from having so many babies that we lose the majority through demographic change, but still be good liberals" - Winning Entry in the 2026 Cursed Academia Prize Sounds like they hired the *perfect* guy to tackle this question.

We were given permission to share it individually. Central administration concurred in it having to be taken off the website "because it might confuse people and make them think that this is Ghent University's position, not just the department's"

Thanks for precision, nevertheless De Vries is in reality the problem for ugent and for the ERC starting grants that is supporting his research. He is not demonstrating an ethical scientific attitude nor lab management. Perhaps I’m biased, I have only seen the department report and Cofnas impact

Great read. I think especially the quote:"racist claims are certainly worth investigating. But extraordinary claims require exceptionally strong evidence, and I don’t see any of that here." shows that academic freedom, science, requires evidence (else it's just free speech). 1/3

The quotes from C on How to take back academia describes an actual attack on academic freedom, there is nothing about adding to the human body of knowledge through rigourus research, just removal of opposing views, of delusional thugs. 2/3

The document, apart from the procedural and impact focus, rightly raises that a researcher who promotes extraordinary scientific claims (albeit outside journals) against prevaling consensus must present extraordinary evidence. The freedom is to present such evidence,not freedom from presenting it. 3

"In the recruitment of academic staff, budget holders enjoy autonomy that can be abused in extreme cases, but in all cases reflects an outdated management culture" This is a sector wide problem and has been for decades. Professional processes would have prevented not just Cofnas appt but Arday too