Thom Scott-Phillips

Thom Scott-Phillips

@thomscottphillips.bsky.social

Language, Psychology, Culture, Philosophy, Society, Evolution • When not doing science I dance the lindy hop https://linktr.ee/thomscottphillips

3.5K followers403 following1.5K posts

A 60% increase is a disaster. And that is on top of 22% and 13% increases in previous years. Plainly AI contributes, so does mass precarity among early (and mid!) career researchers It's obvious that the model needs to change. ERC must show leadership

🎢 We are seeing a record 7710 proposals – a 60.4% increase since 2026 – for ERC Starting Grants in 2027. ⚛️ Physical Sciences & Engineering proposals are most numerous (43%), followed by Social Sciences & Humanities (29%), and Life Sciences (28%). 🔗 link.europa.eu/d3J8Jw 🧪 #AcademicSky

Two good pieces on events in France This one really helped me understand how the riots connect to fiscal policy and France's future in the Euro

Simon Kuper@simonkuper.bsky.social

I've been in France since 2002 and have never seen the streets so violent nor the politics so extreme. From the sacking of the supermarket on my street to the prospect of Présidente Le Pen, here's me @financialtimes.com including thoughts from 2 French Nobel laureates as.ft.com/r/3b05eac8-c...

And this longer piece puts events in historical and political context. Authoritative bsky.app/profile/enge...

Engelsberg Ideas@engelsbergideas.bsky.social

The French have often taken to the streets to force the state’s hand – but the difference today is that the state increasingly resembles a void at the heart of society. France’s long history of revolt | Julian Jackson engelsbergideas.com/essays/franc...

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

Replying to @thomscottphillips.bsky.social

When you stop to think about it, it's absurd. When I apply for a grant from, say, the local council to install solar panels, I don't get to include some % of the overheads I incur maintaining the house in the first place Grants should be for project costs. Not a way to service ongoing costs

This is Dennett's preface to Millikan's "Language, Thought & Other Biological Categories". Whether or not you agree with Dennett or Millikan, it's an excellent opening that both puts the material in perspective in a concise way

I have started using LLMs as tools to aid my own thinking: bouncing ideas around, etc. It's funny how different LLMs have different personalities. I find myself going to different ones for different purposes, even within the same project

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

Seems that one of the main impacts of AI on maths is a growth in quality satire "Of course, most recognize that Borges was a visionless fool who failed to recognize the commercial potential of his library, as he never actually built it." terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/10/15/w...

terrytao.wordpress.comWhy are we even doing all this?[This is a guest post by Rikab Gambhir. This blog post was initially written in a different file format and converted using AI. — T.] First, they came for the artists, and I did not speak out…
Thom Scott-Phillips@thomscottphillips.bsky.social

This is fantastic satire "In keeping with our commitment to objectivity, no human has watched any of the endings. Internal research found that human viewers introduce bias, emotional responses, and the persistent question "wait, who is that guy?"" www.illposed.claims/posts/openai...

Seems that nobody has attempted to use Millikan's notions of direct and derived functions to characterise or understand the notion of a construction, from construction grammar. I've found brief asides to this idea in a few places, but no detailed analysis. This gap is slightly surprising to me

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

Very interesting on how the current moment is completely transformative for mathematics Imv, there is a potentially very bright future to be had but institutional l/ship has to think hard about the incentives. Career rewards and culture must re-directed towards high-quality understanding

Quanta Magazine@quantamagazine.org

In mathematics, the journey matters more than the destination. AI’s murky proofs and speedy answers are upending this foundational principle of the field. https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-ai-the-end-of-math-as-we-know-it-20261005/

Very interesting on how the current moment is completely transformative for mathematics Imv, there is a potentially very bright future to be had but institutional l/ship has to think hard about the incentives. Career rewards and culture must re-directed towards high-quality understanding

Quanta Magazine@quantamagazine.org

In mathematics, the journey matters more than the destination. AI’s murky proofs and speedy answers are upending this foundational principle of the field. https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-ai-the-end-of-math-as-we-know-it-20261005/

A forward thinking govt would remove all indirect costs from grant applications, and develop a method/formula to send that money direct to unis. Then unis would have more incentive to pursue research that is cheap and brilliant, while maintaining their strengths in more expensive areas

This post is unavailable.

When you stop to think about it, it's absurd. When I apply for a grant from, say, the local council to install solar panels, I don't get to include some % of the overheads I incur maintaining the house in the first place Grants should be for project costs. Not a way to service ongoing costs

Wow. Looking just at the thread and the abstract, this seems like a genuine novelty and major advance. Will have to read deeper

Jorge Peña 🇵🇸@jorgeapenas.bsky.social

New preprint with Julian Garcia & @tobyhandfield.bsky.social 🧵 We tested 1,048,576 moral systems of indirect reciprocity, each pairing a strategy (how to act) with a social norm (how to judge others), across all prisoner's dilemmas, snowdrift games and stag hunts. arxiv.org/abs/2610.03832 1/6

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world to use agentic language to describe a new technology

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app

you don’t hold "AI" accountable; you hold AI developers, vendors, and corporations that profit off it accountable holding "AI accountable" is like holding a toaster accountable. it's an inanimate object. it doesn't have wishes, feelings, or desires

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

This is a future of student assessment, imv The essay will be (say) 20% of the mark, and it'll be fine/expected that students use LLMs The other 80% will be a short oral exam defending the thesis in the paper

Hetan Shah@hetanshah.bsky.social

AI is screwing up journal papers: Journal editor asks authors of 10 submitted papers to meet and discuss their paper. Of the 7 that showed up, 3 were unable to answer basic questions about the paper and 3 had difficulty when asked further questions on technical details… medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ask...

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

As common-sensical as this might seem on the surface, I think it's mistaken and I am sad that research l/ship does not seem able/willing to question it Short thread

Funders must remain focused on the core mission of research evaluations: to identify and select the highest quality proposals and researchers.

View full thread

Given these facts, to pursue ranking as a means of distributing funding is equivalent to insisting that luck should be a strong determinant of funding success, while at the same time insisting that you really are filtering for quality

Much better to be honest with ourselves, have clarity over the realities, and plan accordingly. With that in mind, imv funders such as ERC should filter hard for anything above a threshold, and use lotteries after that. With rules that limit the winners of those lotteries from playing again too soon

First, quality does not exist on a single scale. Yes, some ideas are (much) better than others, but there just is no single metric. Quality is multi-dimensional. So the idea of "highest" quality is somewhat meaningless from the start

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

"You are cheating people of the authenticity of their moment" Best discussion yet of the Manchester City verdict and what it tells us about modern football

Stadio@stadio.football

New podcast up, discussing the Manchester City verdict, the problem it raises for the Premier League and more. Available on the main feed, or ad-free to members on Patreon. www.patreon.com/stadio/posts...

Why is Nature trashing its brand? I've noticed all sorts of daft stuff appearing in its pages the past couple of years. Not so in Science

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com

NOT NEWS: Stanford epidemiologist who wrote 324 papers from 2020-2022 expresses grave concern about the proliferation of "extremely productive authors" who wrote a mere 180 or more papers during the same period, suspects fraud is at play, blames global South. NEWS: Nature sees fit to cover it.

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

Back of the envelope calculations: 3600 years of research time went into the collective application process. The research will fund 3200 years of research. We are 400 research years poorer as a result of this. 1/2

Anna Neumaier@annaneumaier.bsky.social

Alter. 21627 Einreichungen auf ein Fellowship-Programm. Wer soll das alles begutachten? 😶‍🌫️ Wer jetzt nicht für mehr Grundförderung und weniger Drittmittel argumentiert, der ist doch nicht gescheit.

Thom Scott-Phillips reposted

Replying to @devezer.bsky.social

i've read from many that "gold standard science" sounds good in principle and that could not be farther from my truth. there is no such thing, there cannot be such a thing, and the sheer thought that it could actually be a good idea betrays a complete ignorance about science and scholarship.

This is a future of student assessment, imv The essay will be (say) 20% of the mark, and it'll be fine/expected that students use LLMs The other 80% will be a short oral exam defending the thesis in the paper

Hetan Shah@hetanshah.bsky.social

AI is screwing up journal papers: Journal editor asks authors of 10 submitted papers to meet and discuss their paper. Of the 7 that showed up, 3 were unable to answer basic questions about the paper and 3 had difficulty when asked further questions on technical details… medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ask...

I'm tired of how agentic language is used to describe AI models. This language avoids placing responsibility where it should be, with humans When a plane crashes we don't think *the plane itself* is somehow morally responsible. It's safety regimes, pilots, etc. Same here

Steve Mullis@stevemullis.net

OpenAI on Wednesday disclosed six new instances in which artificial intelligence systems hid mistakes, made up data and moved files onto the open internet without permission, amid an ongoing industrywide debate about A.I. safety.

"..the multiversity as we know it being disassembled... in many ways, it represents an opportunity to return to roots... But higher education can only weather this period of disruption if it is clear-eyed about what is happening and moves confidently toward a new model"

Yes this. I don't like it when the infrastructure makes it wiser for me, as a cyclist, to go on the pavement, but you can be damn sure that when I do I go slow and give pedestrians lots of space

Marie Le Conte@youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com

will say, as an actual cyclist, that yes, sure, sometimes it really is just easier to go on the pavement for a stretch, but if you do it while going slowly and apologising to the pedestrians you encounter then no one will hate you, "basic manners" does kind of seem to be the issue here, again