Post

So hear me out: managed single-user PDS hosting for journalists

Aftermath@aftermath.site

Bluesky really doesn't want people to say "rest in piss" about Charlie Kirk aftermath.site/bluesky-char...

Possibly! But it's a much different moderation decision to block a whole PDS (even if single user) versus suspending an account that exists on a mushroom PDS. My suspicion is Bluesky would be much more reticent to censor users whose data they're not hosting, especially if they're press.

I'm pretty sure that they will tend to censor individuals by their public key. It's an easier workflow and more politically safe than trying to discern if a whole PDS may need to be censored for a single infraction.

Yeah, it would be *really* good to even be able to understand how moderation works now, let alone how they intend to apply in a hypothetical massively-distributed future.