Post

In Star Trek, Chekov represented a future where the U.S. & Russia were allies (though the TOS Earth was clearly not one government, as Kirk would often mock Chekov's biased Russian history). In TNG, Worf represents a future where the Federation & Klingons are allies. It's less overtly political.

This post is unavailable.

5 reposts41 likes

Of course, rewatching TNG with my son, it's great to see two Black men in major roles. (My disabled son loves seeing Geordi -- a character who lives and thrives with a disability). It's a diversity that would be sorely lacking in, say, West Wing

It's difficult because the setting is a future with faster-than-light travel and literal artificial hearts. I don't think it's "erasure," per se, to suggest that my son's mobility challenges would've been something easily corrected in the womb in the 24th century.

Even today's prenatal care likely prevents issues that might've killed or permanently disabled a child a century ago. My wife's aunt lost a child 50 years ago and the tragic knowledge is that the child would've likely lived if born today (far better ICU treatment for premmies)

DS9's "genetic engineering as autism metaphor" both makes me cringe like hell and gives the best anti-institutionalization monologue I can remember being on TV (at Siddig's insistence iirc)

likewise the "being a low-gravity species as wheelchair user metaphor" episode from an early DS9 season made me cringe at the time but in retrospect does an incredible job both depicting disabled people as whole persons and also explaining the concept of the social model of disability to audiences