Post

Perhaps some self reflection is warranted. An influential research integrity organization publicly shared concerns about some of your choices. Instead of answering the concerns, you provide more evidence of poor judgment?

I've said this before, but it bears repeating: 👉I am not a scientist and have no scientific training. 👉I am not a doctor and have no medical training. If even *I* can find problems in papers that lead to corrections or retractions... I am not the problem.

He did send me a link to one of his responses to a journal last year, but I can’t remember what it said. If he’d only spend more time addressing the issues instead of attacking the people pointing out the issues . . .