Post

It is and that's one of the main reasons why people need licenses to do it. It ensures you have some base professionalism, qualifications, and are held accountable if your methods lead to something like this. I don't trust a machine to uphold the Hippocratic oath.

It’s all buried in T&C, great bulwark protecting large corporations from the common man, woman, or child. Claiming that a child/adult’s use of something advertised as doing everything for everyone was negligent and careless and primary cause of an AI’s response sounds close to absolute immunity.NO

It's the catch-22 they're trying to set up. "Oh, you need to act like it might be a real person but also not *really* because if it is a real person this is literal slavery but also if it's not a real person, there's no reason to care about maintaining it."

Kinda? They actually are trying to make it seem like it's an *actual person* to justify throwing so much money at it, but they also downplay it in other ways to avoid the really obvious problems with that approach.

These corporations have BILLIONS in investment funds and could probably pay any measly fine or plaintiff compensation a judge could come up with in their wildest dreams if they just take the fucking L, but instead they'd rather blow millions on saying the dead end-user was the real villain all along

Jesus. It’s clear either OpenAI doesn’t care or these lawyers have never handled a personal injury case before. This is basically the equivalent of blaming a rape victim for their outfit or drinking too much.

That's part of the playbook for most of the social media sites. You can use our app but if something bad happens from using it then deny any responsibility. They rolled out the latest iteration without testing it sufficiently so now it's the users problem.