Post

So the "free speech absolutists" are now claiming that putting your picture on the cover of a magazine with the headline "the cruel kids table" is "false light defamation." These guys simply crumple into mush at even the slightest hint that maybe, just maybe, some people don't like them.

“False light defamation” lol. You try it, kid.

Exactly! I read the whole article, which was a matter of fact blow-by-blow of what the journalist witnessed and heard. The only negative point was he felt he needed a shower when he left.

What’s the likelihood that a professional journalist for one of the largest magazines, senior enough to have the cover story for the most important news of the year has documented evidence of things that were said at a widely publicized event, with half of the world’s media in the room?