Post

They should pursue this, I’m sure discovery would be a joy

I haven’t read the article, but the cover says nothing about racism. Pearson made that inference. If the article said something about racism that would be a non-actionable opinion. Finally, false light is a tort designed to compensate for hurt feelings. “F your feelings” is kind of MAGA’s mantra.

They are acting like snowflakes

They’re scared. And they should be

Racist snowflakes

Delicious.

Wah wah. They can dish it out but they sure can’t take it.

*****damn fingers***** you're.....

Attention-whore fucktard throws internet tantrum on Twitter. Story at 11.

Lol, this fuckface: time.com/4040179/cj-p...

God, bring back the old "SPY" magazine, then.

Boo f-ing hoo

Back then, they were business/finance majors. Their modern doppelganger are in tech. Same vapid, amoral husks.

If the implications are true, is it defamation?

Wut?

Few people write in clear English, especially when feeling strongly about something. — Old copyeditor

"Cultural domination?" That Wonder Bread bunch? I think not.

I always though they were proud of being evil.

Free speech for them. Not for us.

AHAHAHAHAHA Aren't thse folks — the ones sayign they want carte blanche to call people cruel names — the softest snowflakes?

"You can't call me an asshole, I'm suing you!" is one of those things that proves th statement wasn't an opinion, it's a fact.

Seems like it would be hard to prove damages, given that probably no one these people know reads New York Magazine.

But that picture was taken at a white racist political event.

"How dare you imply we would attend a party using this photo of us at a party"

How in the world do any of those boys think this ends well for them? They'll face decades of derision or worse, no matter how many they try to sue.

Lawyer: Are you in favor of ending USAID? Defendant: Yes. Lawyer: I rest my case, Your Honor.

It’s not “double secret defamation”?

To be fair - it’s boatloads of people that don’t like the jerks - not some

❄️❄️❄️

LOL. That kid got famous for being 10 snd making anti Obama videos. In 2016 he tweeted that he was interested in Bernie Sanders and was BRUTALLy bullied by the right until he backed Trump.

They are absolutely convinced that everybody actually agrees with them and the only reason that nobody sees it is censorship.

Yeah not sure if anyone there was ever at the cool kids table tbh

How come these people say they're not racist? Racism is not a deal-breaker for them. They support a racist and a Nazi, a misogynist. and all the other things that he is and they support the violent Maga and the ludicrously weak Republicans. Call these people whatever you want including racists.

I wonder how many lawyers would line up to defend this case?

What happened to free speech?

They're so fragile.

Boo hoo

It's obviously a true characterization so perhaps he should instead ask himself why he's like that and how he could be different.

They’re clones of each other, including their bitches…..

Snowflakes.

"Don't make me feel bad for who I am and the choices I freely make!"

Awwwe him needs a baba. What a snowflake

So the truth hurts? Defamation is if it's not truth, or cannot be factual. I see facts.

Shoe fits

I mean it's literally a photograph of them at a exclusively white racist political event so

"white racist political event" Like this past Republican National Convention?

They are very special delicate flowers

🌨️❄️❄️❄️

Good lord these people are so weak. Light defamation?

I don't see CJ in this picture.

Isn’t this the story about the group people pay money to join to pretend at parties that they are from “old money”? Where’s the defamation?

So we can only call a white supremacist as such when they become a public official? But aren’t the public officials kinda pushing back on that too? Moving goal posts much but more importantly fuck you you Nazi

Revealing phrasing … “It wasn’t an *exclusively* white racist political event!”

I am not a lawyer. However, true statements of fact and opinions are both protected speech.

Fragile babies! Cry harder!

Because they know people don’t like them. It’s why they are the way they are in the first place. Look at people like Elon or Zuck: they’ve never been popular. They’ve always been outcasts. And even with all their money and power, people STILL laugh at them. And it kills them

Then the administration should be sued for impugning all people who fall into any “DEI” category as “false light defamation”.

Streisand sends her regards CJ.

anyway they’re not racist they just think white men should run everything because standards, else no fair

Like people even know who the Fuck this asshole is.

Their only problem with “cancel culture” was that they might not be the ones doing the cancelling.

Pearson has spent years smearing Mexican and Asian immigrants. He deserves to be raked over the coals in public.

CJ Pearson's a nazi. Pass it on.

To use your own words: Fuck Your Feelings

There's never going to be discovery. Most likely there's never going to be a case. But if there is, it's not going to discovery.

Every last little thing is 'go run & shriek to mommy' type stuff, just nauseating & pathetic

Says the racist without consequences.

Only Conservatives are butt hurt all the time for people calling them out for being the assholes. Stop being an asshole and we’ll stop calling you one.

I saw this movie already--it was called "The Devil's Advocate."

But...but... they ARE "racists without consequences"

Lol, where'd you get your Law degree, Chick-fil-A Leadership Aca--- Oh.

Gross, if you’re going to be a fascist, at least have some guts about it. Such cowards.

If the hood fits...

you still need model releases for cover images because they're essentially promoting that publication so if I'm correct (and I've been out of clearance for magazines for a while, so I may be out of date on this), those releases should protect the publication from such specious claims

Snowflakes.

Snowflakes

And dude, New York magazine didn't create the impression that you were at an all White party. You and all your all White friends did. Also, be ready for discovery.

Every single one of those young adults is there because of their surname, not because of anything they’ve said, done or achieved. That’s why they’re so brittle.

Streisand effect in 3, 2, 1…

What’s the likelihood that a professional journalist for one of the largest magazines, senior enough to have the cover story for the most important news of the year has documented evidence of things that were said at a widely publicized event, with half of the world’s media in the room?

Oh no they exist they're just stupid

I mean these are pretty clear statements that NYMag didn’t celebrate the diversity, equity or inclusion that was represented at the event… I think they should take this to court and make their discrimination claim. They can get Karla Sofía Gascón as their spokesperson :)

My guess is they had to sort through at least 1 photo to find one with only whites in it.

Which is to say I assumed he was featured in the photo, easily recognizable & white (that fragile ego) but he appears to be none of those things so I’m not sure what his standing to sue is. He is not harmed in any way— he’s calling HIMSELF a member of the Cruel Kids. Where are the damages?

Wait, is he concerned about a lack of diversity in the photo? 😂

Loser shit

An all-time great cover line.

Supporting the current administration is a cruelty in and of itself.

I thought they wanted “cultural domination”. Don’t they see that as a compliment?

That is... still not either false light or defamation, let alone the made up "false light defamation"

i remember when CJ pearson "gave up conservatism". guess someone told him there's money in being a token.

The people who like to call libs snowflakes, are actual snowflakes themselves.

I love how he tells on himself for bringing up racism when it isn't mentioned anywhere.

Carrie Bradshaw had a way better case against New York Magazine. That question mark was hostile…

"Hey, I got painted in a false light!"

"Hey, I got painted in a false light!"

"Hey, I got painted in a false light!"

"Hey, I got painted in a false light!"

Somebody ought to let CJ know that people are allowed to state their opinions about other people.

Does he think the quotes of statements along the lines of “I’m just so glad I can be racist aloud in this group!” Will help or hurt his case?

The photo looks like professional work, almost as though the photographer was invited and used high-end equipment, and was not a waiter stealing a quick snap with his phone.

It is weird.

What is the cause of action?

They're as much about "free speech" as the pro-Apartheid @piratenpartei.de, which was absolutely OK with the Bestätigungsverbot Scholz issued against @yanisvaroufakis.bsky.social for standing against the Israeli #GenocideOfPalestinians. cc @glynmoody.bsky.social

It's funny how for decades Racist like to create names for "other" ppl that's disrespectful & dishonorable: "you people", "c*nt", "n*gger", "snowflake" "Libt*rd" etc...& claim Freedom of Speech! If you call Them Liar, Deplorable, Insurrectionist or Racist; it's a problem & they want to Lawyer up!

aweeeeee snowflake

funny, being "racists without consequences" is exactly what they want...

Who the hell is c j Pearson anyway?

Did they or did they not attend said event?