Post

Can't articulate why, but I find something deeply insipid about the practice of addressing conference-goers as "Conference". "Conference, is it just me or-" "And that's why, Conference, I promise-" Dehumanised nothingspeak. Grandiose, vague, bland all at once. Bleak and sad in some weird way.

5 reposts208 likes

It feels a bit like politicians addressing Today presenters by their first name. I want to tap them on the shoulder and say "you're not talking to them, you're talking to me". Maybe the reflexive 'conference' thing is an attempt to reassure conference that he's talking to them

Any group address not acknowledging people as persons and its audience will imply and signal they are playing to metrics and corporations and concepts rather than individuals and their opinions. Did any prior discourse speakers of the ages refer to their forum as "Forum," and Quorum as "Quorum,"?

Chat makes a lot of sense to me for streamers and has been in use for a while. Random influencers or even just normal people now saying Chat is very weird cause they're not engaging with a live audience.

However cringe you may find it, at least the speaker made an effort. One of the things I love most about Brazilian Portuguese is the term “a gente.” It’s completely inclusive, can be used in almost any situation, and is pervasive in common speech. I wish English had ONE word like this.

But that form of address is because the ‘conference’ is the final, highest policy making body of the party. It’s not a rally (like the Tory party) or a festival, it’s a huge, democratic committee meeting (with all the complexity+polticing that implies), so it’s like saying ‘members of the committe

This reminds me of how mildly irksome I find it when an arts festival refers to itself with no prefacing article: “this year at Festival we’re delighted to include…”

Hey, that one does have the defence that it’s very handy if you forget the child’s actual name so you can opt for something cutesy instead