Post

Putin has no ideology; he is, in fact, an intellectually unsophisticated person. His entire political worldview rests on two very simple narratives. 1/9

One is that the West is waging an eternal war against Russia. The other is that Ukraine is merely an instrument of the West in the current episode of the perennial anti-Russian war. 2/9

In my recent essay, I traced the origins of these ideas to Putin’s teenage years and his fascination with Soviet spy thrillers, showing how his KGB service and specific events later solidified that basic worldview: shekhovtsov.substack.com/p/putins-gen... 3/9

There have been various attempts to “intellectualise” Putin’s thinking by linking him to Ivan Ilyin, Alexander Dugin, and the like – but it is all utterly excessive: all of Putin’s statements about the West and the war ultimately boil down to those two simple ideas. 4/9

Yet despite their simplicity, these notions are deadly. If Ukraine is seen as an instrument of the West in its perennial war against Russia, then the Russian leadership views it as an imperative to destroy that instrument – thereby striking an indirect blow against the West itself. 5/9

Such a blow, in their logic, would inevitably weaken the West and improve the prospects for further Russian retaliatory efforts. 6/9

Ukraine is therefore not the primary target of Russia’s geopolitical revisionism – the West is. The destruction of Ukraine is merely a means of striking at the West without confronting it directly. 7/9

Those in the West who believe peace can be secured by surrendering Ukraine to Russia fundamentally misunderstand the hierarchy in Putin’s thinking: the destruction of Ukraine is a tactical objective, not the strategic aim of his war. 8/9

Putin made it clear that he wants to reconstitute the Soviet Union - and more besides no doubt. It's funny that he wants to do this on the back of doing virtually nothing to lift up the Russian people. Who believes this shit?

Маггопс.

What's that?

Very true, thank you. For those unfamiliar with the actual history of moskau I would add that it is not so much about geopolitical entities, but topography: in the sense that it is considered of utmost importance of having a proverbial rocket division west of the Carpathian mountains.

In principle it is of secondary importance, who and what is in the way. Obstacles to this strategic goal are openly regarded and described as "aggression" towards moskau and I think that the kremlin is sincerely mystified why this narrative is not taken seriously in the west.

Unfortunately USA leader is now a Putin puppet and understanding Putin's goals is unimportant to him.

Once you are in the Whitehouse you are no one's puppet. All previous arrangements can be thrown out the window by the most powerful person in the world. He's not a puppet - he's an old and at this point senile moron.

No he’s a puppet what don’t you understand. He’s only one in a line of them ready to go when he transpires. The heritage foundation owns and paid for their offices. Aka the KKKlan. Are you missing the facts?

Blackmail is blackmail, though