Post

I wonder how important the particular prompt is. Does it matter that you're asking for *better* code? What happens if you say something like "Please rewrite this code"? It would still give the model the benefit of having existing code to start with.

jfc I’m still so ignorant about the fundamentals…like this is how chatbot interfaces have been operating all this time (just statelessly looking at the previous responses)?? 🤯

As an aside, I find what makes your linklogging work so well on Bluesky is that you can have multiple link previews in the same post -- the original and yours. Works very well, and don't think I've seen that on the other socials

The conversation history thing is an illusion though: each new prompt has to manually replay the conversation before it to get the impression of being part of a chat session as opposed to a single prompt+completion cycle

Great post. I’ve found a similar thing in my interactions with Claude writing Terraform configuration (to deploy web services and supporting infrastructure)… I start out with a prompt stating what I want, get something decent back, then iterate with more prompts and better results.

My take on this is that we’re iteratively exploring the latent space. The initial prompt and response puts us in the ball park. By asking “write better code” we’re probing the neighbouring, high dimensional space.

I think this is why some agentic workflows produce seemingly novel results - they’re designed to iteratively explore until a condition is met. We don’t necessarily do that when chatting with an llm.