Post

I don’t think there’s a single serious critic who says AI’s not useful? The concerns I see are about content rights, worker impacts, environmental effects, epistemological threats, or media manipulation. But that’s all predicated on the idea that it *does* work, often too well for people to manage…

Kevin Roose@kevinroose.com

The NYT Magazine asked me and @caseynewton.bsky.social to open their AI issue by talking about how we use AI, why it's not going away, and how you can't be a serious critic if you're in denial about how useful it is. Bluesky's gonna love this one! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/m...

The larger context of the point is that there are tens of millions of people who find it useful, and we need to reckon with how we’re either going to contain that harm or offer more sustainable, less damaging alternatives than what is currently possible. That’s the point I’m making.

Millions of people can be--and in this case, are--dead wrong. They find it useful because they do not care about truth just so long as they can offload the task of having to think. This is, at its very root, a paradigm of intellectual rot; one that threatens the foundations of civilization itself.