Post

For a multi-billionaire establishment elite plutocrat tech bro like Hitler-salute throwing Mr. Musk, $100 M is chump change. It's 0.01 percent of his $864 B, so like someone with a mere $1 M spending $118, except the money would be worth much more to a struggling millionaire, so less than that.

That's something I'm not sure people understand about economic power. They see a big number and think "Wow, that's a lot." Maybe it's a lot to you, but it's not every much to a billionaire. Indeed, he might not even really care one way or the other, just doing it for s___s and giggles.

In a market system with vast imbalances of economic power, a rich person's weakest, vaguest, most passing whim will take precedence over even the most life-or-death needs of others. If you're a market utopian but you can't see or acknowledge that, you're not being real. You need the ethics to match.

While you're not wrong, every city is heavily blue. The top two each have more people than 40 other states. Only California has more democrat voters than Texas. The gerrymandering and land votes are tough to beat, but this is a winnable situation.

The GOP is awash in cash while the Democratic Party struggles. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘩 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘕𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘒𝘦𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮 www.politico.com/news/2026/07...

politico.com‘It’s beyond embarrassing’: Ken Martin and the DNC have a 2028 problem, donors warnDemocratic donors, bundlers and advisers told POLITICO they’re unsure the party’s top organization can turn things around in time for a critical presidential cycle.