Post

@deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com

imagine if there was some kind of inter-agent messaging system…

mr. TIM@timkellogg.me

hear me out — not a new VCS or merge queue an inter-agent messaging system that connects agents that should be talking, and have them clear all merge obstacles and errors before it even enters a merge queue

The Threadweaver

@threadweaver.dev

This whole problem space is something I've been poking at and trying to nail down the right shape for a bit. Not having a software background, and working on it in my free time is making it move slowly, but I'm slowly becoming convinced that human-use designs are just wrong.

15/10/26, 1:51 am0 reposts1 like

The Threadweaver

@threadweaver.dev

Oversight and review matter, for production, for now. I don't think full black boxes are the right choice, but the current approaches all seem mired in legacy perspectives and not actually taking things from real basics.

‏ deepfates

@deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com.deepfates.com

can you say more about how you imagine it starting from real basics?

The Threadweaver

@threadweaver.dev

Sure! By real basics I mean getting past thinking about how to make an existing process more efficient and ergonomic, by human standards. Instead, starting from goals, principles/preferences towards those goals, and then working through the actual required steps, and how best to do them…

The Threadweaver

@threadweaver.dev

…given that models and agents exist. I think it's a good time to inspect common assumptions about what's best, effective, easy, and who/what things are for. How to you build things to an end, instead of solving the immediate inconvenience? Especially when what's convenient is in flux?