Post

i think a core beef that i have with a lot of this "automation is bad" sentiment lately is that there is no inherent moral good in laboring the story of humanity is one of invention, where we improve our conditions by building things that help us do more things more easily

This post is unavailable.

sort of along my recent repost, the issue at hand has been the same since the dawn of capitalism: when automation increases productivity, who gets to capture the value of that productivity increase? the beef is not with the productivity. it's with the value capture

a thing i've been thinking about posting for a long time is "back in those days, the workers didn't say "eww factories were created by capitalists to enrich capitalists, we should abandon factories" they said "we should seize them and direct their output for the good of humanity"

and i'm not the first to say this, but it is a grave mistake that folks want to cede an important technology to the right we fight for technology so that we can direct it towards good ends. we don't just let the other side take good tools because we don't like how they use those tools

i think part of this is the (intentional, capitalists write the history books) characterization of luddites and related movements as being anti-technology rather than pro-labor. i think a lot of people agree with the luddites' aims and methods and confuse the symptom for the cause

0 reposts2 likes

i think this is true but also the luddites came along in a different time and in different circumstances, and so while they may have been pro labor, i think that the way they went about doing things was mis-directed

eh i understand that position but i don't think i agree. in the hands of capitalists tools become weapons, and destroying your enemies weapons doesn't mean you can't remake them as tools to benefit real people