Post

und was ist, wenn man der Ansicht ist dass sein geistiges Eigentum mehr Wert ist als lausige $3000 ?!

Are you repeating the framing of the copyright mafia that illegally copying is the same as robbery? Apart from that, they don’t copy the books, they train models with it. There is no actual copy of the book in the model. The model might remember parts of it, like a human, when they read a book.

No.

Demand disgorgment

My publisher now wants to give my book and other copyrighted works to AI. I wonder if I should send them this story. No, I won't let them do it.

I found my work in a database of works they stole recently, how do I get included in the class action suit?

Now do everything else that was stolen. Make AI pay, jail the thieves then shut it down.

I don't think you've considered the fact this technology has done far more harm than good and are in a bubble that's going to crash. It's doing a great deal of damage to a generation of students for one.

Some of my work is in the libgen dataset, but I won't get anything from this judgement, because the copyright is held by the copyright mafia: Springer, Elsevier etc. I'm happy for it to be in the dataset and happy for it to be used to train AI models.

I think the judge was very wrong to say AI training is fair use and they should challenge that ruling, but it is being looked at in other suits too.

Drop in the bucket. Copyright infringement comes with huge fines.

If you publish something you make it public. That means that anyone, or anything, that can access it can learn from it. That's not unreasonable and not illegal, and in fair use.