Post

Let's not be hasty about this. We need to be careful here. The "fictional" AI leaders should *also* be imprisoned alongside Altman et al. Just in case.

Headline: men are bs’ing about ai. Actual study data: men and women are bs’ing about ai at roughly similar rates. Also, the article tried to make it look like media is skewed heavily male when specifically citing experts. 29% of workforce is women, but ratio in media is 25%.

Considering how most of these men's first use of AI was for personalized porn, no one should be surprised!

I know so many faker dudes like these

This tracks

In their defence they did ask ChatGPT and trusted the answer

Perfect. 😆

Well, the non-AI people are often fictions as leaders, so, it's a wash.

Ok, but to be clear, so did 40% of women. A 13% difference.

in defense of men that's not all they're faking knowledge about... oh crap was that not a good defense?

Fungibility > non fungibility. Although the actual math behind NFTs were brilliant. It just was used on monkey pictures instead of verifying provenance of critical infrastructure 😭

Similar to the results of a "Where is the clitoris?" study.

lol

The worst suggestion here is to add more Sheryl Sandbergs to Tech Bro boardrooms. We need to put a public advocate in those boardrooms. The general point that men are overconfident is well-known and multifactorial. 40% of women claimed to recognize the fake leaders too despite knowing less about AI.

You know they don't know AI's if they have never summoned one on the FM spectrum

How does this pertain to AI knowledge? You could do the same with celebrities and probably get similar results.

The confidence is wild... some people would rather fake knowing than just admit they don't know.

it's Great