Post

Demonstrating reasoning and language capabilities in computers alters our understanding of self, even if we don't particularly like the alteration

This is the crux of the debate, right? Whether it's doing mimicry or reasoning. I struggle to see how you could view it as purely mimicry. It has to tie together multiple novel thoughts in a logical construction to create its responses.

It's not a debate though, because we know that it's not doing reasoning. We know because we know what the algorithm is. It's a prediction engine. It produces an output that it calculates to be the probable result given its inputs. It does not cogitate. This is known.

No replies yet.