Post

knowing how things work allows you to criticize and fight things way better than ignoring them because you dislike them does

insisting that guns are bad and their users are immoral, so you don't need to know anything about them, doesn't change what happens when someone aims one at you, and keeps you from knowing how to make one safe if it's necessary for you to do so

i think LLMs suck and it doesn't change the fact that someone can ask Claude Fable who I am (with its ability to search the web turned off) and it will tell them. knowing their capabilities allows me to intentionally shape my online presence to not stand out to something inhuman analyzing my posts

4 reposts117 likes

you can believe that LLMs are just as incapable as they were in 2023 all you want. that just means the FBI, which uses modern ones that work pretty well for whatever the hell they're doing with them, knows more about them than you do

also insisting they have or don't have characteristics or abilities that any coworker with a chatgpt account can go and disprove you about instantly just makes you look stupid, and reflects badly on everyone else. would you prefer ammo that can trivially be rendered inert, or do you want to win?

I'm just not sure it matters either way? Except for winning an argument, what problems can I solve better by knowing more about how they work?

walking mirage@wolf.observer

i think LLMs suck and it doesn't change the fact that someone can ask Claude Fable who I am (with its ability to search the web turned off) and it will tell them. knowing their capabilities allows me to intentionally shape my online presence to not stand out to something inhuman analyzing my posts

if the AI shit is driving you nuts and you're sick of hearing about it, you aren't required to know how it works. but you should at least try not to spread misinformation about it that's going to leave people who think you know what you're talking about ill-equipped to deal with it

i would gently push back on the notion that coworkers can meaningfully prove you wrong on average in the fields where these things are supposed to be the most effective. i have worked in software for a decade and every encounter with ai is still correcting obviously wrong output

that doesn't mean your coworkers won't generate something wrong, slap each other on the back, and call you an idiot, but it isn't the stuff working correctly, and it demonstrably on average still does not. code generation requires eagle eyed watching, reviews are reliably factually wrong, etc.

I was searching instagram for an old friends profile, and its inbuilt AI search dingus immediately told me the address of his workplace, as well as doxxed it’s proprietor ironically it didnt find his actual profile