Post

One thing I've been toying with, instead of talking about "PDS" and cryptic nonsense like that is: Atmosphere Service Provider, like an ISP but for the social internet. Part of the motivation is that "Sign in with Atmosphere" only works if people have seen that before.

B. Prendergast@renderg.host

Log in with Blacksky Log in with Bluesky Log in with Eurosky Log in with Gander Log in with Northsky Log in with Pckt Log in with Social Selfhost Log in with Wsocial Log in with hello you still there??? OR… Sign in with #Atmosphere 🌀 wecanjustdothings.leaflet.pub/3mlv5oijn5s2q

the Philippines, and I think Indonesia and Singapore, also use "Social Media" side-by-side with SNS. If we go back 20–30 years ago: - "Text"/"Texting" was exclusively a Filipino terminology. - SMS was the term used by the rest of the world (which is unknown to this day in the Philippines). The

point is that culture and language plays a role in communication, and I think this is why the community can't agree on anything. 1. We're all from different cultures and languages. 2. We have different valid experiences and views on what works _locally_ (can't emphasize that enough). 3. There is no

0 reposts2 likes

single authority managing the communication for the ATmosphere network. (100% decentralization isn't good, like in this case (look at the Fediverse network, people hate the term (was coined since 2010/2), proposals were given, but no one agreed which new name to use)). For this discourse to be

fruitful, the ATmosphere community must form a central authority who will decide on the terminologies and approach to login, publish it, and everyone with existing projects to follow. Then the working group is abolished, until such a time a new WG is needed. 🖖🏽