Post

people love to leave out that you can’t really do serious harm reduction without also housing people wild, that people ALSO need a safe place to sleep, to eat, to have stability, in addition to needing safe injection sites and clean needles almost like we should call things…basic..needs…

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

It was inevitable that reactionary centrists would turn against harm reduction and call for a return to mass incarceration

97 reposts437 likes

Fair points all around. But have you considered that the tech bro and oligarchy turd group-chats these opinion writers are in have decided that harm reduction is woke and just doesn’t work … because FoxNews and Rogan told them so?!?!?!

it is absurd how delusional you have to be to think that harm reduction is the problem and not the fact that you’re abandoning people as they live in squalor on the sidewalk or in tents or even bouncing between shelters people can’t imagine if they didn’t have a home, what it would do to them

Hate to be this guy but a huge issue is a large part of the drug using homeless population turn down housing help because of rules not allowing them to do drugs. I’m pretty liberal but I do want to push back on the belief by many liberals that we should accommodate drug use in our parks,metros etc

And to follow up to avoid the dunking I’ve been active in Houston Tx with helping and outreach and so many will turn down help. They just want to do drugs on the sidewalk. But that actually shouldn’t be tenable. Drugs users ruin third spaces and reduce the public’s trust in public goods like busses

I mean tbh I think that kinda makes housing where drug use is allowed seem more necessary, but I can’t think of a way that would ever get funded and I think the idea of clean needle exchanges being a trade off of dirty needles for clean could help with incidences of dirty needles

I can absolutely guarantee that no human being who has been given any reason to believe they have access to better "just wants to do drugs on the sidewalk". Perhaps consider that they're already familiar with the "help" you're offering and it doesn't meet their needs and dehumanizes them?

If housing at all is contingent on immediately and forever ceasing to use drugs that someone is addicted to, you're not offering housing. You're taunting them with terms and conditions that are medically, literally impossible to live up to.