Alice Hunsberger

Alice Hunsberger

@aagh.bsky.social

Trust & Safety loudmouth. (Head of T&S at Musbi; writes T&S Insider for Everything in Moderation @eimdotco.bsky.social) More here: https://alicelinks.com/

1.6K followers435 following150 posts

This model is filling a specific gap: it's designed for content moderation in live chat, streaming, usernames... basically anywhere you need a good decision on text immediately, but you want a flexible taxonomy/ policy list that you control (not a preset vendor's idea of what harm labels you need).

Alice Hunsberger reposted

The 47th president proudly spoke against trans people and anti-racism in his inauguration speech: people will now feel more empowered to spew hate. If you manage support, marketing, trust & safety, etc. create a playbook NOW to support & empower your team to respond to hateful customers. 🧵

View full thread

Create resources and support for your users/ customers who may also be the target of harassment and hate. Signal to them in signs/ messages/ FAQs/ knowledge bases/ etc. that your team will support them.

Frontline teams will tell you that hate from customers is nothing new, but I really do think it will ramp up over the next few years, and I want to make sure our frontline teams don't suffer for it. /🧵

The 47th president proudly spoke against trans people and anti-racism in his inauguration speech: people will now feel more empowered to spew hate. If you manage support, marketing, trust & safety, etc. create a playbook NOW to support & empower your team to respond to hateful customers. 🧵

View full thread

Create psychological safety for your team. Let them know that you have their back. Listen to them. Check in on them. Make sure they have benefits that cover mental health support. We're all going to need it.

Let your team use fake names when responding to the public, or (even better) don't use names at all. Recognize that some open ways of signaling support (i.e. putting pronouns in your signature) will also open people up to harassment. Allow folks to make decisions based on what's right for them.

The 47th president proudly spoke against trans people and anti-racism in his inauguration speech: people will now feel more empowered to spew hate. If you manage support, marketing, trust & safety, etc. create a playbook NOW to support & empower your team to respond to hateful customers. 🧵

View full thread

Create a "no questions asked" escalation policy, so that frontline staff can escalate to a manager if they feel unsafe or unable to answer a question. Make sure that escalation chain goes all the way up to VP or C-Suite level so everyone is supported.

The 47th president proudly spoke against trans people and anti-racism in his inauguration speech: people will now feel more empowered to spew hate. If you manage support, marketing, trust & safety, etc. create a playbook NOW to support & empower your team to respond to hateful customers. 🧵

Get really clear with senior leaders of the company you work for about corporate values and how to uphold them. Create tricky hypothetical scenarios (i.e. your biggest client sends a racist email; someone threatens to sue you for having a DEI program) and get answers BEFORE you need them.

Write policies about expected user/ customer behavior, make them public, and hold people to them. "We will ban you if you disrespect or threaten our staff", for example. Or "We will ban you if you report trans people simply for being trans."

Many of us working at tech companies are having to make moral and ethical decisions when it comes to where we work, what we work on, and what we speak up about. It's super difficult to know what to do, or even what your options are! 🧵 with resources

View full thread

Huge thanks to the integrity institute and TSPA/ TrustCon for enabling these kinds of discussions among t&s folks. If you know of other conversations/ resources in this area, or are an expert and want to be on the podcast or chat TrustCon proposals, let me know!

Many of us working at tech companies are having to make moral and ethical decisions when it comes to where we work, what we work on, and what we speak up about. It's super difficult to know what to do, or even what your options are! 🧵 with resources

One thing I haven’t seen anyone talk about with Meta’s moderation changes: now relying on manual user reports for “less severe” issues that still violate their policies, rather than using a combination of user reports and automated detection. It’s bad. Here’s why: 🧵

View full thread

Actually 1 more thing: This allows meta to dodge responsibility. “The users don’t like it. They reported it. It’s not us.” It won’t make moderation more fair or better. It’ll be less consistent. But gives Meta an excuse that is more politically accepted right now.

One thing I haven’t seen anyone talk about with Meta’s moderation changes: now relying on manual user reports for “less severe” issues that still violate their policies, rather than using a combination of user reports and automated detection. It’s bad. Here’s why: 🧵

View full thread

Honestly, I feel it’s often better to just not have the rule at all if you can’t proactively detect and remove violations. Automated detection isn’t perfect by any means, but it’s a heck of a lot better than user reports alone.

One thing I haven’t seen anyone talk about with Meta’s moderation changes: now relying on manual user reports for “less severe” issues that still violate their policies, rather than using a combination of user reports and automated detection. It’s bad. Here’s why: 🧵

View full thread

Policies are only as good as ENFORCEMENT— and consistent enforcement at that. I have learned this the hard way, when I was head of t&s at a platform with little no to automated detection.

Relying on user reports alone means that the platform will have very spotty enforcement of some rules. Many users will get away with rules-violating behavior because it is never reported.

One thing I haven’t seen anyone talk about with Meta’s moderation changes: now relying on manual user reports for “less severe” issues that still violate their policies, rather than using a combination of user reports and automated detection. It’s bad. Here’s why: 🧵

View full thread

If they see lots of folks doing something bad and it’s not immediately removed, they assume it’s ok and they won’t report. Even worse, they will often start exhibiting the same behavior themselves.

One thing I haven’t seen anyone talk about with Meta’s moderation changes: now relying on manual user reports for “less severe” issues that still violate their policies, rather than using a combination of user reports and automated detection. It’s bad. Here’s why: 🧵

Most users don’t read policies. They’re not experts on which kinds of hate speech are ok and not ok (especially confusing on Meta’s platforms now, after recent policy changes). Mostly, users go along with the vibe of a place.

Meta says they will "censor less" - including more speech about gender identity (allow hate speech against trans people) WHILE ALSO Today User Mag reports Instagram restricting content on searches for things like queer and nonbinary for teenagers who had the "sensitive content" filter turned on.

They claim it was a mistake and have reversed it (And I understand; I have made mistakes too!) But it's an interesting illustration of how speech & censorship goes both ways: it's hard to be Pro Free Speech (allowing speech against identities), while restricting content about those identities.

Block the Negative Nancys! (They might be bots)

DuendeonFuego@duendeonfuego.bsky.social

So about ten years ago I found a small network of bots on Reddit dedicated to spreading hate. The thing about it is that these weren't even responding to political topics - they were just responding to random keywords with insults and hate. The same bots are now here. You should understand why. 🧵

Now seemed like the best time to share these words of encouragement. We're a few months out from TrustCon, the high of spending time together has dissipated, and we're all trying to muster some energy for a new year. <3

Could a more transparent, collaborative, and adaptable policy enforcement model combat cries of 'censorship' and empower diverse online communities to self-moderate? Open-source policy documents and AI-driven auditability might hold the key. Read more www.everythinginmoderation.co/fighting-com...

everythinginmoderation.coFighting complexity with auditabilityCould a more transparent, collaborative, and adaptable policy enforcement model combat cries of 'censorship' and empower diverse online communities to self-moderate? Open-source policy documents and A...

The expert of t&s 🧵strikes again! Such an important read.

rahaeli@rahaeli.bsky.social

We have a live example of why they're called "pig-butchering" scammers! They're called that because they use the whole pig, ie, they don't just take a little money from their victims, they slaughter them and use them all. I'm gonna be slow on this thread because I'm doing exhaustive alt text, but:

Alice Hunsberger reposted

this essay is full of actual research showing trans women pose no threat to cis women in restrooms & other sex-segregated spaces. if you encounter any cis ppl discussing/debating the Mace/McBride/congressional restroom fuckery, pls share this link with them: juliaserano.medium.com/transgender-...

juliaserano.medium.comTransgender People, Bathrooms, and Sexual Predators: What the Data SayContent Warning: while I will not be describing any actual instances of sexual violence or child sexual abuse, these issues (and false…