Ben Ambridge

Ben Ambridge

@ambridge.bsky.social

Prof of Psychology/Child Language, University of Manchester. Author of PSY-Q, Are You Smarter than a Chimpanzee? and The Stories of Your Life

556 followers346 following99 posts

Change tack

Merriam-Webster@merriam-webster.com

We acknowledge that no one has the bandwidth for this, but if it helps: -It’s ‘sleight of hand’ -It’s ‘bated breath’ -It’s ‘lo and behold’ -It's 'buck naked' -It’s ‘brass tacks’ -It’s ‘free rein’ -It’s ‘toe the line'

Ben Ambridge reposted

New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science. A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!

Dr Nick@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social

ok the editorial and publication process is taking too long, so here is link to the accepted manuscript for our systematic review of the newborn face preference literature. it unearths a rather strange tale. check it out, any thoughts much appreciated www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Ben Ambridge reposted

PSA for the American (North, Middle, and South, I presume) collaborators: Europe just did the whole clock changing thing. Prepare for some meeting time confusion if you meet at fixed times

"Big" journals will spend hundreds of dollars on checking that the references are in the correct format, but literally zero dollars on checking that the analysis code runs, or that the study ever happened in the first place.

Fantastic news! We did something similar a few years ago for specifically developmental language research ldr.lps.library.cmu.edu so do get in touch if you want to learn from our mistakes (or, even better, have any advice for us!)

ldr.lps.library.cmu.eduLanguage Development Research
Cam Hostinar, Ph.D.@camhostinar.bsky.social

I am pleased to announce the launch of our new diamond open access journal Psychology Across Development (accepting submissions starting today!). We are a lifespan developmental journal. (1/3) escholarship.org/uc/psycdev

Ben Ambridge reposted

When we fake smiles, are we smiling our way to happiness or misery? 🙃 For decades, emotion embodiment theorists have emphasized happiness boosts -- all while emotion labor theorists emphasized misery costs. In this Registered Report, we finally put these ideas side-by-side doi.org/10.1016/j.je...

View full thread

Why would anyone care about all this? Well many, probably MOST accounts of what speakers' knowledge of language looks like (e.g., @stefanmuelller.lingo.lol.ap.brid.gy) DON'T assume that speakers have constructions with meanings at all. These accounts, I argue, can't explain our data 7/n

Of course, the studies are preregistered, the data and syntax are available, so feel free to check my working and let me know if you find any holes! (and sorry for publishing in a "glamour journal", but even us Open Science fans need a "big paper" from time to time!) 8/8

View full thread

So a passive like "Emily was seen by John" is more acceptable if - say - she owes him money and is hiding from him (meaning she's really affected by being seen), than if Emily is completely unaffected by being seen (e.g., they're just strangers passing on the street) 5/n

In short, a sentence is acceptable to the extent that the meaning we're trying to get across meshes with the meaning of the sentence construction we're using (e.g., @adelegoldberg.bsky.social @thomscottphillips.bsky.social) ??c.f., @ejfranci2.bsky.social 6/n

View full thread

So if we can come up with some outlandish context in which the causation is direct and physical - "swimming someone" by manipulating their limbs, "jumping someone" by picking them up and bouncing them, the meaning we're trying to convey fits better with the meaning of the construction 3/n

It's the same for the passive construction, which has the meaning of "the first-named person being highly affected" (e.g., Bill was run over by a bus). Passives are somewhat ungrammatical when this doesn't hold (e.g., *Bill was remembered/resembled/known by John) 4/n

Specifically the transitive-causative construction (e.g., [PERSON] [VERBed] [PERSON]) has the meaning of direct, physical causation, which is why "Someone swam/laughed/jumped" the boy (c.f. "Someone made the boy jump") is ungrammatical in the first place 2/n

Ben Ambridge reposted

Replying to @mzettersten.bsky.social

Meta-analytic plot below: only 1 out of the 31 samples find evidence of the effect. Huge effort from the entire ManyBabies 3 team led by @ingmarvisser.bsky.social. Imo an important moment for reflection in infant research (esp. language development) given the centrality of this finding. 2/2

I decided it's time to practice what I preach and make sure I publish all my null/inconclusive results, particularly when my theoretical approach really predicts the effect will be found, (and it *has* been found in similar studies). Only this way can we hope to find out what's actually going on!

Language Development Research@langdevres.bsky.social

Congrats to @ambridge.bsky.social, Motoki Saito, Samuel D. Jones, Tomoko Tatsumi, Kumiko Fukumura, Ayuno Kawakami & Colin Bannard on publishing "No evidence for an input frequency effect for children’s learning of participant role markers in Japanese" in LDR! ldr.lps.library.cmu.edu/article/id/9...

Ben Ambridge reposted

Last year, I publicly complained multiple times (see e.g. elevanth.org/blog/2025/07...) that the open access movement had been captured by publishers, and we are now worse off than before open access. Well people got mad at me for saying it. But I think things are still getting worse.

Eric Schares@eschares.bsky.social

🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm

In the UK, the “coffee maker”, is usually a tank of boiling water with a tap.

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social

Sneering about the "faculty lounge" is deeply funny. Most departments don't have one, but if they do, it's like a wall of mailboxes, a coffee maker and maybe a mini-fridge. You're basically sneering about the break room on The Office. "Oooh, look who has a *vending* machine! Excuse me, m'lord!"

Ben Ambridge reposted

It's hard to believe that OECS has now published 200 articles!🎉 A huge thank you to everyone who has contributed to OECS—our authors, reviewers, readers, and fantastic section editors, and especially @mcxfrank.bsky.social frank.bsky.social and @hbaum.bsky.social Excited for the next chapter!

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

Ben Ambridge reposted

Nearly four years ago we asked ourselves, "what would it look like to have a field-leading, completely free reference work for cognitive science"? It's been so fun editing OECS with @asifamajid.bsky.social and @hbaum.bsky.social. I can't believe we have published 200 (!!) articles! oecs.mit.edu

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

100% this! I see so many between-participants studies with like N=50 when a proper power analysis would tell you you need like 500! Never between-subjects unless you have an EXTREMELY good reason. Remember, an underpowered study is often worse than no study as it can mislead!

Mike Frank@mcxfrank.bsky.social

Within-participants designs need 2-8x fewer participants than between-participants designs for the same level of precision. Ch 9 of Experimentology argues for making within your default. 🧵 experimentology.io

I said it on T*****, and I'll say it again here! A mixed-effects model in lme4 with its default settings gives you outputs that LOOK LIKE "ANOVA-style" main effects, BUT THEY ARE NOT! www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... Thanks @drlearnasaurus.bsky.social for saving my papers many times over!

sciencedirect.comContrast coding choices in a decade of mixed modelsContrast coding in regression models, including mixed-effect models, changes what the terms in the model mean. In particular, it determines whether or…

Ben Ambridge reposted

Open Mind now has an IF of 2.9 after less than 9 years of existence, an amazing accomplishment. This is just short of Cognition (3.1)!

languagemit.bsky.social@languagemit.bsky.social

A brief history of Open Mind 2013: Dick Aslin was disillusioned with Cognition (Elsevier). Nick Lindsay (MIT Press) wanted to create an open access cognitive science journal Nick contacted Dick, and Open Mind started. Editorial, February 2017, issue 1 of Open Mind direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...

“The “strongest risk factor” is not the form most related to harm. It is the form least redundant with whatever else is in the model.”

Kristoffer Magnusson@rpsychologist.com

New interactive blog! "Why Adjusted Regression Coefficients Are Less Descriptive Than They Look" rpsychologist.com/descriptive-...

Ben Ambridge reposted

Big Team Science projects like @manybabies.org @themanybirds.bsky.social etc. are brilliant for more reasons that this short piece can cover, including their openness to researchers from all contexts and backgrounds - you don't even need to have access to the target population! #OpenScience

Nature Portfolio@natureportfolio.nature.com

Nature reports on how labs are teaming up to run a host of huge projects that aim to bring rigour to cognitive science. #cogpsyc 🧪

Ben Ambridge reposted

Does engaging with the arts help to slow the aging process? According to this new paper from Fancourt et al the answer is yes! Alas, the paper is actually unsuitable for such claims. Let’s examine by discussing how you'd establish whether arts engagement actually caused future health! 1/18 🧵

academic.oup.comDoes leisure activity matter for epigenetic ageing? Analyses of arts engagement and physical activity in the UK Household Longitudinal StudyAbstractBackground and Objectives. Over the past decade, ageing clocks have become widely adopted as important tools for understanding biological ageing an

Ben Ambridge reposted

After years in preprint, our paper is finally out! We introduce LambdaG, a simple new authorship verification method that matches complex neural approaches. This supports the theory of grammar as a behavioural biometric (like a signature or gait). www.nature.com/articles/s41... #nlp #llm #forensic

nature.comGrammar as a behavioral biometric: using cognitively motivated grammar models for authorship verification - Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsHumanities and Social Sciences Communications - Grammar as a behavioral biometric: using cognitively motivated grammar models for authorship verification

To paraphrase Thomas Edison (or whoever actually said it) Statistical analysis is 1% Investigation and 99% Preparation. Most mistakes I see (and make!) result from rushing too quickly to model building!