Andrew Dupont

Andrew Dupont

@andrewdupont.net

apologies to all you programmers who followed me thinking i was going to post about programming (also @savetheclocktower@mastodon.social)

111 followers77 following534 posts

_The Athletic_’s blurb about why the F1 race in Austin is fascinating… I agree that, _if this sounds interesting to you_, you should probably be at the race, you weirdo

I am ambivalent about encountering McConaughey anywhere (nothing against the guy, just not on my bucket list)… yet his presence is the only thing that saves this from being a comprehensive “people whose departure from Austin would make it much, much cooler” list

The tragedy of it is that utilitarianism is liberating in its simplicity (just try to reduce the net amount of suffering in the world!) and deserves a framework that _doesn’t_ serve to launder practically any selfish act into being moral

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com

Great piece by @xriskology.bsky.social on how the effective altruism cult has helped destroy actual philanthropy - with dangerous and deadly results for many people in need:

If your moral framework does not guard against special pleading and motivated reasoning, you have blundered. Practice debating the voice in your head that reassures you you’re a good person! Make that voice prove it!

When you start using keyboard with a new layout, how long does it take your brain to adjust? Not “new layout” like Dvorak — I mean subtle differences like “the arrow keys are farther away than they are on my laptop keyboard.” Trying to decide how much longer I continue my current, uh, experiment.

TEAMS: Look, I get it. You don’t want to be using Teams; you wish you were using Slack. Here’s a preset to make all my keyboard shortcuts match Slack’s. ME: Thanks! A pleasant surprise. But… how do I move up and down the channel list via the keyboard, like in Slack? TEAMS: I don’t know what that is

ME: So this is a chat app, right? TEAMS: Totally. ME: It does chat and nothing else. TEAMS: Exactly so. ME: So tell me why I have a “1” on my dock badge when I have no new chat activity. TEAMS: Oh, that’s because someone updated the description of a meeting that’s on your calendar.

RETAILER: Your thing shipped and here’s the tracking number COURIER (when given tracking number): I don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about. This “tracking number” is no more meaningful to me than if you had simply mashed on the keyboard COURIER (24–36 hours later): Yeah, this is a package

The meanest thing anyone was willing to do to Dolly Parton was cast James Woods as her love interest in a movie. Don’t know whose call that was, but I hope they apologize to her as part of a daily ritual

My earliest years of web dev trained me to recognize “URL in address bar changes several times before reaching destination” as an anti-pattern. Even though now I see it half a dozen times per day, it’s been hard to re-train myself to recognize this as “normal and safe authentication flow”

“Always more taxes, yet nobody ever talks about cutting waste.” — someone who posts a lot on Nextdoor but apparently never reads anything from the 500 neighbors who also talk about cutting waste

If you try to log into something at work and it fails inexplicably, eventually check to see if you’re typing in an email address that belonged to you three jobs ago

Is this a “normal” thing to post on Nextdoor? Sure; I’ve read far stranger. Is this a “normal” thing to post on Nextdoor in response to someone else’s lament that a beloved local restaurant is closing? A harder question to answer.

In no other community have I ever encountered such a sizable tranche of users that seem to have a baseline opposition to everything — as if they’re being made to use the site against their will.

As AI inserts itself into how humans produce things with computers, at what point do we ensure that nobody misuses “its”/”it’s” again? I would’ve guessed that’d be way closer to the beginning than “brainrot deepfake TikTok engagement bait,” but maybe that’s why I’m not a “thought leader”

Years ago, if someone had said “come up with a startup idea and I’ll fund it,” I would’ve come up with this and nothing else. “Like Grammarly, but hyper-focused and automatic.” The business model would’ve been that I, Andrew Dupont, would be willing to pay not to be irritated at seeing “its” misused

You’re right. You’re absolutely right. I feel silly for bringing it up. I’ll just accept _the mother of all coincidences_ and we can restart this whole news cycle. You can proceed with your plan to _further_ monetize the World Cup and let’s please never speak of my faux pas again

I have an involuntary reaction to text formatted with seemingly RANDOM capitalization like this. I know it's because Nextdoor (like most sites) doesn't offer richer formatting options than this — but my brain is trained to believe that this is simply how NIMBYs type.

View full thread

I was not thorough with my redactions but it’s fine because you can’t find a damn thing on Nextdoor. I have to bookmark posts I comment on or else I’ll never be able to get back to them ever again

Also, the second commenter ran for city council this year in her LA-area city; bullet dodged. I would not vote for anyone this conspiracy-pilled even if I agreed with their policy goals

I have an involuntary reaction to text formatted with seemingly RANDOM capitalization like this. I know it's because Nextdoor (like most sites) doesn't offer richer formatting options than this — but my brain is trained to believe that this is simply how NIMBYs type.

View full thread

I’m tired of letting that stuff go unchallenged. I push back on it not because I think I’ll change a NIMBY’s mind but just in case a third party reads the exchange and is persuaded.

Shit, one of my fellow travelers must’ve left sensitive documents on a bus or something. (I’m kidding; anyone who can type these words and believe them would not be caught dead on a bus)

I have an involuntary reaction to text formatted with seemingly RANDOM capitalization like this. I know it's because Nextdoor (like most sites) doesn't offer richer formatting options than this — but my brain is trained to believe that this is simply how NIMBYs type.

And as for why I torture myself by even _existing_ on Nextdoor: Judging by who actually shows up to city meetings, NIMBYs are outnumbered. But judging by Nextdoor you’d think that everyone in your neighborhood loses their mind whenever an apartment complex opens up half a mile down the road.

Discord’s business model is aimed at making money from people who use it for reasons other than I do (open-source work). It’s as if I were able to use Pinboard for free because it had decided its only revenue would come from charging a small fee every time someone bookmarked erotic fan fiction.

And then every two weeks or so I just have to glance at (and quickly dismiss) a weird promo offering me some sort of status I don’t need in exchange for currency I don’t have in order to promote a game/movie/show I don’t care about.

If you’re wondering “are England fans the way they are because of the team? Or is the team the way it is because of England fans?”… the answer is _infinitely yes in both directions_

I am paralyzed by the sheer number of ways a modern employer can put badges on my dock icons that, when pursued, lead to content that could not be less relevant to me

In other news, the phrase I never want to hear again after this World Cup is “I've seen it given before.” I bet you have! An individual referee has about 500% more leeway than they deserve to have; if anything, VAR is showing the seams in the rulebook

View full thread

Association football's laws are like common law: oversimplified, impossible to administer without interpretation, relies on the accumulation of years of precedent, not easily geographically transferable, hinges on how much you think one situation resembles another from the past

What they have in common: that fans will blame the technology for revealing the flaws more than they'll blame the rules or the organizations behind them. Officiating has been crazy this time around and people will use it as an excuse to eliminate VAR or greatly narrow its purview. Ain't VAR's fault!

In other news, the phrase I never want to hear again after this World Cup is “I've seen it given before.” I bet you have! An individual referee has about 500% more leeway than they deserve to have; if anything, VAR is showing the seams in the rulebook

American football's rulebook is like the Napoleonic code: exhaustive, plenty of examples, gets fatter every year to cover the novel situations encountered in the season prior, unwieldy, makes you wonder how anyone gets good at refereeing

Today we all get to enjoy these distinctly American ideas: * Seeing Trump fuck up something you like and being powerless to stop it * Watching other authority figures play along rather than tell him “no” * Expecting other people to be adults when Trump acts like a child

* Arguing among ourselves about who should feel the shame that Trump is incapable of feeling * Sitting quietly with the unease of being governed by an unaccountable institution