Professor of Public Administration, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen. www.asmusolsen.com & https://paopa.org/
Foto: Freja Wille.
We (@karlemilbendtsen.bsky.social) are re-building the field of Public Administration from the ground up!
Well, okay, we built a website with a table of papers.
The Archive of PA outside PA is a living archive of PA research published outside PA journals.
Go see: www.paopa.org
📢 The Call for Papers for EPSS 2027 is open!
After a fantastic first conference in Belfast, we’re heading to Copenhagen 🇩🇰, 24–26 June 2027.
⏰ Deadline: 13 Nov 2026
👉 Call for papers: epssnet.org/2027-copenha...
1/2
📢 The Call for Papers for EPSS 2027 is open!
After a fantastic first conference in Belfast, we’re heading to Copenhagen 🇩🇰, 24–26 June 2027.
⏰ Deadline: 13 Nov 2026
👉 Call for papers: epssnet.org/2027-copenha...
1/2
A surprisingly large part of declining measured scientific productivity is attributed to declining average quality of the researcher pool. Have a nice day! www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...
New, from me:
Everything seems awful, but Co. Kerry, Ireland is great. A photo essay on what to do if you visit (especially for Killarney and Dingle). Replies are open, so please add your own suggestions.
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/welcome-to...
After Arday enlisted Carter-Ruck, one of the United Kingdom’s leading defamation law firms, to send @timeshighered.bsky.social a letter, the publication spiked the story, according to three sources who spoke to Retraction Watch.
The Department of Political Science at Aarhus University is hiring both Assistant Professors and Associate Professors.
Assistant Professor: international.au.dk/about/profil...
Associate Professor: international.au.dk/about/profil...
Please share these opportunities with your networks!
Our book The Brussels Bubble: Inside the European Union in the Digital Age with @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org is out now OPEN ACCESS!
We take you on an ethnographic journey behind the scenes of multilateralism, from Brexit to COVID-19 to Russia's war on Ukraine
👉 Find it here: tinyurl.com/m237ry4b
Landing in Belfast for the European Political Science Society. Please share your favorite things to do, places to eat or drink. (Don’t bother recommending the Titanic museum (done it) or conflict tours).
現在は行政研究の黄金期にあるが、かなりの論文が経済学ジャーナルに掲載されている。それらと行政研究ジャーナルの論文とはどう違うか?──を記述的に比較するというもの。
Public Administration Beyond Public Administration Journals
doi.org/10.1017/S104...
Congrats to @donmoyn.bsky.social on winning the 2026 George Fredrickson Award for Career Contributions from @pmra-1991.bsky.social!
From advising the UN to shaping presidential budgets, his global impact on public policy is unmatched. 🏆
Read more: https://myumi.ch/9J9N3
Copenhagen is stocking up on high-end saisons and training staff to describe every style as “pleasantly tart” to maximize sales. @donmoyn.bsky.social is in town.
We (@karlemilbendtsen.bsky.social) are re-building the field of Public Administration from the ground up!
Well, okay, we built a website with a table of papers.
The Archive of PA outside PA is a living archive of PA research published outside PA journals.
Go see: www.paopa.org
Election day in Denmark
Dutchification of the party system continues with record levels of party fractionalization.
We will be more Dutch than the Dutch before the end of today.
(The Dutch will still have way more narrative systemic reviews in Public Administration journals.)
Building affordable housing ➡️ support for funding housing.
Nearby homeowners ⬆️ support; renters ⬇️ support. Both are “the policy adjacent”—secondhand recipients & drivers of policy feedback.
Forthcoming @ajpseditor.bsky.social ( doi.org/10.1111/ajps...) w/ A. Magazinnik & @msands.bsky.social 1/9
This is great paper about interdisciplinarity:
*points out that Econ is now doing a lot of high quality public administration research
*Econ is also mostly ignoring traditional PA research, PA is a bit more attentive to Econ
*Both groups would benefit from engaging much more with each other
We got a paper in @pspolisci.bsky.social l on public administration beyond public administration journals
A substantial share of quantitatively oriented PA research is being produced in top economics journals!
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...@karlemilbendtsen.bsky.social
Five stylized facts:
Stylized fact 5: PA scholars do not dismiss this work as irrelevant.
When asked directly, they rate PA in economics about as highly as PA in PA journals on relevance, inspiration, discovery, and overall quality.
So the issue is not fit. It is fragmentation.
If PA wants to understand its own research frontier, it cannot just read PA journals.
PA is bigger, more global, and more methodologically ambitious than its journal boundaries suggest.
A way forward is for PA to be the integrator of knowledge across fields.
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Stylized fact 3: PA in economics studies a much broader world.
Compared with PA journals, it includes more non-Western settings and more work from the Global South.
If you only read PA journals, your picture of the field is systematically too narrow.
Stylized fact 4: PA in economics uses tougher causal designs.
More field experiments.
More quasi-experimental work.
More explicit identification.
A lot of the cleanest causal evidence on public administration is being published outside PA journals.
Stylized fact 1: PA in economics is not niche.
It is only a small share of top econ output, but economics is so large that this still adds up to a body of research comparable in size to all quantitatively oriented PA in top PA journals.
Stylized fact 2: PA in economics exists in a parallel universe.
PA journals cite economics a bit.
Economics barely cites PA journals back.
This is not one integrated field. It is two literatures studying similar questions with very limited connection.
Russia, Venezuela, Iran, China, the Sahel region, the United States ...
Want to know why state agents carry out brutal repression — or participate in illegal coups?
Our new book "Making a Career in Dictatorship" provides answers — it just got published by @academic.oup.com:
tinyurl.com/ystwm3tf
"President Trump is now claiming that one reason he is pushing to acquire Greenland is that he didn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize" 🙃 www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01...
I would like to announce my own goodwill mission to Denmark this May, where I will meet @asmusletholsen.bsky.social and the King.
www.cbsnews.com/news/congres...
This is a really cool paper. It shows that role models can influence how people think about college majors & working in government. But it also shows that effects fade over over time which should constrain our expectations about how one shot interventions like training actually can change behavior.
This: In the same week that Vance expressed concern that France and the United Kingdom had nuclear weapons, he said Denmark was not a very good ally to the US. It is shameful.
bsky.app/profile/thom...
Tak til chatten:
>>“Imaginaries” is a conceptual Swiss army knife: high-status, flexible, theoretically respectable, and safely non-positivist. Its heavy use reflects not conceptual laziness, but a field where epistemological signaling through titles has become central to publication success.<<
My first name is made up in two novel ways in this review (just before the reviewers point out that the book under review spells @alasdairroberts.bsky.social wrong in two different ways). An the authors are Norwegians - brothers from another mother! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
"viewpoint discrimination is a key motivator behind these student demands. While the desire to restrict academic freedom also reflects an interest in upholding prof. academic standards... these principles are applied unevenly & predominantly to conservative viewpoints" www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Good morning. A coda (from me) on this replication business.
While I understand the impulse, it is disheartening that most of the discussion generated by this replication is about the replication "process" -- both the APSR's process and my own process.
What could we be talking about instead?
I have now read the response by Turnbull-Dugarte and López Ortega again with a clearer eye.
Multiple claims in this response are untrue or seek to obscure the truth.
My interest has always been the accuracy of the scientific record, so I feel compelled to note some of these claims here.
A critique of our (w/ @bertous.bsky.social) paper “Instrumentally inclusive” has just been published.
Our response is under review (see below on process) but we feel obliged to share our draft for balance since the comment has been released without the response.
osf.io/rn6h3/files/...
Very unprofessional of the APSR to publish a response to a published article without publishing the original authors' reaction. "They will be published in the same issue." So we see them together when we get our hardcopy in the mail and flip through it on a Sunday afternoon?