Buffer

Buffer

@buffer.com

The social media management platform for scheduling, publishing & analytics across every major network. Plan your content calendar in one place. This account is managed by real humans. ๐Ÿ’™ โฌ‡๏ธ buffer.com/bluesky

73.8K followers217 following2.4K posts

The build window for Buffer Commit, our first build contest on the Buffer API, opens Wednesday, Oct 28! โณ Join our live Q&A tomorrow at 11 AM ET. Register now โ†’ buff.ly/FdV0Y66

NEW: collaborate with your team in Buffer with real-time conversations. ๐Ÿ‘‹ you mention a teammate ๐Ÿ”” they get notified โœ๏ธ you make content edits together โšก๏ธ approvals happen faster ๐Ÿฅฐ everyone is happy Learn more at buff.ly/T3FnEl4

The build window for Buffer Commit, our first build contest, kicks off Oct 28! Taking part? Join us Oct 27 at 11 AM ET for a live Q&A on the vision with our Founder CEO Joel Gascoigne, plus details on judging and prizes. Register now โ†’ buff.ly/bZJsiIg

Weโ€™re hosting a live walkthrough of Buffer Insights on Monday, October 19 at 12pm ET. Darcy and Kelly from our Customer Advocacy team will show you around and answer your questions live. ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ”— Register here: buffer.zoom.us/webinar/regi...

View full thread

What to know before you register: โ€ข The build window runs from October 28 to November 13 โ€ข Open to anyone 18 and over with a free or paid Buffer account, solo or as a team โ€ข Winners receive $1,600 or more, a year of Buffer, and a spot in our project gallery

We're eager to see apps and integrations that solve a real-world problem for the people who post via Buffer every day. The prize pool is 10% of our August 2026 net profit: $25,600.

That prize pool will be shared equally by up to 16 winners. Buffer turns 16 on November 30, so there's one winner for every year we've been around! ๐ŸŽ‚

Raise a hand if you are going to hit a 100-week streak with Buffer this year? ๐Ÿ‘€

Tamilore, our Senior Content Creator, posted a Substack Note every day in September for The Weekly Scroll, Buffer's own publication. She batch-wrote most of them and scheduled them ahead. Here's how scheduling Notes works, and what a month of it taught her. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Two answers from the FAQ: Scheduled Notes don't perform worse than ones posted live, since timing and engagement matter more. And neither Substack nor Buffer can schedule a restack or a reply, so those stay manual. ๐Ÿ’™

Tamilore, our Senior Content Creator, posted a Substack Note every day in September for The Weekly Scroll, Buffer's own publication. She batch-wrote most of them and scheduled them ahead. Here's how scheduling Notes works, and what a month of it taught her. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Now the lessons! Tamilore's first is to batch-write most of the week's Notes in one session, and leave a few slots open for the spontaneous replies and restacks.

The second is to schedule for when your readers are active, whatever time you happen to be writing. The third is to keep a running list of Note ideas. She keeps hers in Buffer's Ideas and pulls from it when she sits down to write. ๐Ÿ‘€

Tamilore, our Senior Content Creator, posted a Substack Note every day in September for The Weekly Scroll, Buffer's own publication. She batch-wrote most of them and scheduled them ahead. Here's how scheduling Notes works, and what a month of it taught her. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

There are a few things the native scheduler doesn't do. There's no calendar view, so your scheduled Notes sit in a list of drafts. You schedule one Note at a time. The Note only goes to Substack. And per-Note reporting stops at likes, replies, and restacks.

Scheduling through Buffer covers those gaps. Connect Substack as a channel, write the Note, and pick a time. To send the same Note to LinkedIn, Threads, X, or Bluesky, select those channels in the same post. Once it's live, you'll see impressions, engagement, follows, and subscriber conversions!

Tamilore, our Senior Content Creator, posted a Substack Note every day in September for The Weekly Scroll, Buffer's own publication. She batch-wrote most of them and scheduled them ahead. Here's how scheduling Notes works, and what a month of it taught her. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Inside Substack on the web, write your Note, click the calendar icon at the bottom, pick a date and time (it uses your local timezone), then Save and Schedule. The Note sits in your Drafts with its publish time showing. You can schedule up to three months ahead.

On mobile, the same option lives in the three-dot menu when you're writing a Note. Tap it and choose Schedule.

Tamilore, our Senior Content Creator, posted a Substack Note every day in September for The Weekly Scroll, Buffer's own publication. She batch-wrote most of them and scheduled them ahead. Here's how scheduling Notes works, and what a month of it taught her. ๐Ÿงต

First, yes, you can schedule Substack Notes, and there are two free ways to do it. Substack added a scheduler to its own composer, and Buffer's Substack integration is built on Substack's official API, in partnership with Substack.

As of today, you can plan and queue your Substack Notes alongside your Bluesky and other channels in Buffer! ๐ŸŽ‰ ๐Ÿงต One calendar and one publishing rhythm, plus no context switching:

Buffer shows you which Notes bring in free and paid subscribers, plus impressions and follows. You see which pieces of writing convert people into paying subscribers, and you can double down on what works. ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Notes publish through Substack's own API, so they land exactly as they would if you posted natively. And it's available on our free plan! ๐Ÿ”— Connect your Substack account in Buffer and schedule your first Notes today: buffer.com/substack

buffer.comSubstack Notes Scheduler: Plan and Share Your Notes | BufferSchedule Substack Notes and share the same Note to LinkedIn, X, Threads, and Bluesky. Plan every channel on one calendar and see which Notes earn you subscribers. Free to start.

Hey all! What has helped you most build community on Bluesky? Tell us in this thread. ๐Ÿงตโฌ‡๏ธ

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

You don't need this exact stack to try it. Her lighter version starts by hand. Ask Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews the questions your customers ask you, note where your brand shows up and where it doesn't, and only write into the gaps you can back with real material. ๐Ÿ’™

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

The writer never touches the automation. They open Buffer, pick up a brief, and write the post. On the next run, the agent checks whether it went live, pulls its metrics, and asks Peec whether the brand is now mentioned for that prompt. That check is what closes the loop.

The results are early, and Violeta says so. Four of the five prompts have moved off 0% in Peec, but the posts weren't live yet, so she won't credit the pipeline for it. The clearest win is buy-in. AI search is now on the owner's list, next to compliance and email campaigns.

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Every gap is then checked against what the company can credibly say. The agent searches 390 older product pages, the firm's social posts, and its YouTube transcripts. Prompts with no supporting evidence get dropped. Only the top five ideas move forward each week. ๐Ÿ‘€

Those five land in Buffer's Ideas board as writer-ready briefs. Each one carries the AEO prompts the post should answer, the audience, key points, brand positioning, verbatim source material, and the format rules (50 to 299 words, no Unicode bold, direct address).

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Every weekly run opens by checking what's already in motion. Through Buffer's API, the agent sees what's drafted or queued so it doesn't create duplicate ideas, then pulls reactions, comments, impressions, and reach for published posts. Posts that performed well become signals for follow-ups.

Next it asks where the brand is invisible. Peec runs 50 tracked prompts daily across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. A prompt gets flagged when it sits at 0% after seven days of tracking, drops under 20%, or falls 15 points or more in a month.

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

There's even data on what gets a LinkedIn post cited. Scrunch found technical details raise the odds by 77% and named entities by 33%, while Unicode bold formatting lowers them by 58% on ChatGPT. A small firm with deep technical expertise is well positioned for that kind of post.

The stack runs on three tools, each with one job. AirOps orchestrates the workflow and holds the company's Brand Kit and Knowledge Bases. Peec AI tracks which AI prompts mention the brand and which don't. Buffer supplies the LinkedIn engagement data and is where the finished briefs land.

Violeta Maftei is a content marketer. While running test prompts for a course, Perplexity named her client's brand in an answer, even though nobody had done any work to put it there. So she built her first automation to see what would happen with effort behind it. ๐Ÿงต

The client is a small Romanian firm that sells lightning and surge protection equipment. It has been selling for three years, grows on referrals, and does content marketing in bursts. AI search wasn't on the owner's radar at all.

She picked LinkedIn on purpose. Semrush found it's the second-most-cited source across ChatGPT Search, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity, appearing in 11% of AI responses. For professional queries, Profound found LinkedIn is the most cited domain across all six major AI platforms. ๐Ÿคฏ

72 people at Buffer stopped their regular work and spent the week building! It was our third company Build Week, and our most impressive, with 112 projects completed. ๐Ÿ”— Here's a full recap of everything we built, from customer features to a house-swapping app: buffer.com/resources/bu...

buffer.comThe Buffer Team Shipped 57 New Internal Tools in 5 Days72 people at Buffer stopped their regular work and spent the week building. Here's a full recap of everything we built, from customer features to a house-swapping app.

Miguel David, Engineering Manager at Buffer, had 200 unread articles and no time to read or write about them. Until: he vibe-coded a macOS app that summarizes 10 at a time and queues them using the Buffer API! ๐Ÿงต

View full thread

Most articles never make it past the three bullets. The few that do become drafts in his queue, waiting for his take. One line from Miguel's piece stuck with us: "I read more thoughtfully now because I know I have a place to put my opinions." ๐Ÿ’™

Miguel David, Engineering Manager at Buffer, had 200 unread articles and no time to read or write about them. Until: he vibe-coded a macOS app that summarizes 10 at a time and queues them using the Buffer API! ๐Ÿงต

The result is Reader Chomper, a small Mac app that connects three tools he was already using. Readwise stores his reading list, an LLM summarizes each article in 100 words and three bullets, and Buffer queues his posts to LinkedIn and Bluesky.

The feature that took him longest is also the simplest! The app serves up 10 articles at a time, so every session ends. Getting that right, he says, "took longer than any of the actual code did."