Cath Haddon

Cath Haddon

@cathhaddon.bsky.social

Senior Fellow @instituteforgov.bsky.social + history, Whitehall geekiness and constitutional agony aunt Subscribe to our newsletter: http://bit.ly/3dxiJ5J

13.4K followers858 following712 posts

The fiscal devolution roadmap probably won’t be the biggest story on budget day, but it may be Healey’s most consequential announcement. @tompope.bsky.social on what he's looking for in this early test of how radical Burnham intends to be on devo www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/fisc...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukWhat should be in the fiscal devolution roadmap? | Institute for GovernmentThe fiscal devolution roadmap will set out changes to how mayors raise and spend money.

p.s. yes it's a picture of a boat and sailors should not navigate off a roadmap, but there is a story in my family about once accidentally navigating off of traffic lights that they thought were a buoy so just deal with it.

The comments are reminding me that i am still annoyed about the pub quiz a few years back where i sucumbed to the peer pressure to let them pick Churchill when i knew it was Callaghan who had a tattoo from his navy days.

Ian Dunt@iandunt.bsky.social

Arguably not the most important issue today, but is this the first British prime minister with a tattoo?

Cath Haddon reposted

We’re recruiting a researcher for the newly expanded @instituteforgovernment.org.uk public services team (and for a researcher in the UK govt team). If you’re interested in public services policy and want to work for (imho) the best team at IfG the please apply! Application close 1 Nov

instituteforgovernment.org.ukUK Government and Public Services Researchers | Institute for GovernmentTwo roles available now to join the Institute for Government.

Cath Haddon reposted

📣 Arts & humanities researchers: applications are open for the AHRC Engaging with Government Course 2027. Learn how policymaking works, engage effectively with government, and boost your policy impact. Apply by 29 Oct 2026. 🔗 ukri.org/events/engaging-with-government-course-2027/

ukri.orgEngaging with Government course 2027A course designed to provide an introduction to the policymaking process, and to enable academics to apply this to their own research.

Cath Haddon reposted

NEW: Plans to reduce EHCPs look optimistic and Burnham's public service reforms still need a plan for schools In our first IfG Performance Tracker chapter, funded by @nuffieldfoundation.org, we look at how the government is performing on its schools agenda [1/9]

instituteforgovernment.org.ukPerformance Tracker 2026: Schools | Institute for GovernmentThe government must better measure success across its school priorities and set out a clear long-term vision for the structure of the school system.

Cath Haddon reposted

It was great to welcome the "Parliament Matters" podcast to "the political studies powerhouse that is Queen Mary University of London". Featuring the brilliant @ruthfox.bsky.social @darcyxtip.bsky.social @cathhaddon.bsky.social & @danielgover.bsky.social, plus me going tonto on billionaire donors.

Hansard Society@hansardsociety.bsky.social

🎙️ NEW: PMQs – Parliament Matters Questions. We took the podcast to Queen Mary University of London for a live Student Week special (@qmul.bsky.social) Students put their questions to @robertsaunders.bsky.social, @cathhaddon.bsky.social & @danielgover.bsky.social Listen now: buff.ly/afqoBHv

Cath Haddon reposted

Following Angela Rayner's decision to fully review her predecessor’s LGR decisions, today at 12.30, the @instituteforgovernment.org.uk, in partnership with @grantthorntonuk.bsky.social, has brought together a great panel to discuss how this came about and what happens next. Sign up details below.

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

EVENT | Angela Rayner has put plans to restructure local government on hold. So what went wrong and what happens next? We'll now discuss on Monday 14 September, 12:30, with Amanda Askham @grantthorntonuk.bsky.social, @matthewfright.bsky.social, Heather Jameson from The MJ and @akashpaun.bsky.social

In 2021 we looked at how legal advice intersects with policy making. We came to same conclusion the govt now seems to have drawn: ultimately its for ministers to decide how much legal risk they want to take. They have the power to set the culture. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukJudicial review and policy making | Institute for GovernmentMinisters and officials should accept that judicial review improves policy.
Hannah Keenan@hannahkeenan.bsky.social

New gov legal guidance is good /maybe it's not the blob?? It's v easy to say 'the civil service is risk-averse' and blame the institution for slowing everything down. Civil service is risk-averse in places, but it's not because civil servants inherently don't want to get stuff done...

View full thread

In the end, we argued: a. good policy was far less likely to be challenged b. a lot of frustrations could be improved by better use of legal advice through the process - so it's not a 'lawyer says no' at the end c. Ultimately its for ministers, and the PM, to decide what risk they want to bear

So i'm glad the govt has belatedly agreed with us. As @sirjjkc.bsky.social says, its good to see guidance directed at ministers to support more consistency on legal risk. As long as they don't forget sometimes the law helps make policy better. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/new-...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukNew government, new legal risk guidance | Institute for GovernmentNew guidance is an insight into the government’s attitude to the law and legal risk.

In 2021 we looked at how legal advice intersects with policy making. We came to same conclusion the govt now seems to have drawn: ultimately its for ministers to decide how much legal risk they want to take. They have the power to set the culture. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukJudicial review and policy making | Institute for GovernmentMinisters and officials should accept that judicial review improves policy.
Hannah Keenan@hannahkeenan.bsky.social

New gov legal guidance is good /maybe it's not the blob?? It's v easy to say 'the civil service is risk-averse' and blame the institution for slowing everything down. Civil service is risk-averse in places, but it's not because civil servants inherently don't want to get stuff done...

View full thread

Depts are v variable in how they respond to legal risk. For some depts it is daily, for others v rare. But even then, the nature of the policy can mean different approaches.

We also found that ministerial attitudes to legal risk were v variable. It can change minister to minister. For inexperienced mins, hearing words like 'high risk' can be v worrisome. Others know it comes with territory and happy to press ahead.

In 2021 we looked at how legal advice intersects with policy making. We came to same conclusion the govt now seems to have drawn: ultimately its for ministers to decide how much legal risk they want to take. They have the power to set the culture. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukJudicial review and policy making | Institute for GovernmentMinisters and officials should accept that judicial review improves policy.
Hannah Keenan@hannahkeenan.bsky.social

New gov legal guidance is good /maybe it's not the blob?? It's v easy to say 'the civil service is risk-averse' and blame the institution for slowing everything down. Civil service is risk-averse in places, but it's not because civil servants inherently don't want to get stuff done...

Back in 2021, frustration with JR or legal advice hampering policy was very in vogue. But, as we pointed out, there had been very little done to look at how legal advice affects policy making. And yet the impact of JR is as much about how the risk of legal challenge.

I know you were all discussing this this morning, but i was busy. Yes it's a thing, no it's not new. There was a tradition of former PM's/ ministers stocking the No10 library. Goes back to c.1930s? Supposedly Blair era didn't, but Johnson 'brought it back' (see Telegraph on that).

This post is unavailable.

Cath Haddon reposted

Highly recommend this excellent @instituteforgovernment.org.uk @cathhaddon.bsky.social series

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

PODCAST 🎙️ Mid-term prime ministers – Episode 3: Adjusting to the role In the final episode of our series, we explore how incoming mid-term PMs adjust and the lessons former mid-term transitions hold for Burnham’s premiership – or future mid-term PMs www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/podcast/insi...

🚨Episode Three of Mid-Term Prime Ministers We dig into early election pressure all mid-term PMs go through, and the Brown, May and Johnson versions of that Talk about how long the honeymoon period lasts And explore how mid-term PMs to adjust to the role podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/i...

podcasts.apple.comMid-term prime ministers – Episode 3: Adjusting to the rolePodcast Episode · Inside Briefing with the Institute for Government · 20 August · 37min

🚨 New podcast Second in our mid-term PMs series The transition - why reshuffles much more precarious for mid-term PMs - whether they think enough about organising No10 - the all impt q of how to balance continuity v change from their predecessor www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/podcast/insi...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukMid-term prime ministers – Episode 2: The transition | Institute for GovernmentEpisode two of our series takes a closer look at what happened in the first weeks and months of the mid-term premierships from Major to Sunak.

Cath Haddon reposted

Great holiday listening if you're away over the summer, or everyday listening if you're not. Loved hearing @cathhaddon.bsky.social 's expert views with a fascinating range of guests from both quite far in the past and very recent transitions.

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

NEW PODCAST SERIES 🎙️ Mid-term prime ministers: transitions of power between elections In episode 1 former officials and special advisers share the behind the scenes of the preparation for an incoming PM. Listen to the full podcast www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/podcast/insi...

Cath Haddon reposted

NEW PODCAST SERIES 🎙️ Mid-term prime ministers: transitions of power between elections In episode 1 we explore the recent history of mid-term changes of PM from Major to Sunak. Feat. Gus O'Donnell, Mark Sedwill, Helen MacNamara, Simon Case and more www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/podcast/insi...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukMid-term prime ministers – Episode 1: Preparing for change | Institute for GovernmentSpecial guests Lord O'Donnell, Mark Sedwill, Helen MacNamara, Simon Case and others share the behind the scenes of the preparation for an incoming PM.

🚨 Episode 1 of our summer podcast series is out!! We look back at mid-term PMs from Major and Brown, though May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak. Former cabinet secs and spads took us inside what happened and what makes a mid-term transition different. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/podcast/insi...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukMid-term prime ministers – Episode 1: Preparing for change | Institute for GovernmentSpecial guests Lord O'Donnell, Mark Sedwill, Helen MacNamara, Simon Case and others share the behind the scenes of the preparation for an incoming PM.

Huge thanks to my guests for this series Gus O’Donnell, Mark Sedwill, Helen MacNamara, Simon Case, Stewart Wood, Salma Shah, Lee Cain, Asa Bennett and Rupert Yorke

Cath Haddon reposted

Andy Burnham must avoid repeating Keir Starmer’s failed ‘civil service reset’ For a PM who prides himself on plain speaking, he could do worse than start with an honest conversation about the relationship with the civil service www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/andy...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukAndy Burnham must avoid repeating Keir Starmer’s failed ‘civil service reset’ | Institute for GovernmentPlatitudes and generalisms serve no one: we need an honest conversation about trust.

Also worth saying for transparency that the reference to 'lots of my colleagues' by Nicola Hughes (NH) was undoubtedly a reference to @gavinfreeguard.com Others who worked here at the time (me) weren't quite as obsessed with craft beer but certainly respected Gavin's commitment.

Jill Rutter@jillongovt.bsky.social

Just looking through @instituteforgovernment.org.uk #MInistersReflect interview with John Healey and instructive that this is what he picks as his big achievement in govt www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/defaul...

It was kind of Nicola to protect Gavin by pretending there were lots of other colleagues who were as obsessed. I am happy to have undone that anonymity for the good of the historical record.

Cath Haddon reposted

Cath Haddon reposted

This will be a great webinar with @jillongovt.bsky.social @stuarthoddinott.bsky.social and @tompope.bsky.social - do join us on Thursday and send in the questions you’d like the team to answer…

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk

EVENT | Andy Burnham: How is the new prime minister changing the direction of government? 📅Thursday 30 July 2026, 13:00-13:50 Join us online as an expert panel assesses Andy Burnham's early decisions, his key appointments, and the way he is approaching the job of prime minister.

Cath Haddon reposted

Great to see! Appointing lots of PPSs can be seen-often rightly-as just boosting the payroll vote. But used well they're a source of strategic strength for ministers As @aliceolilly.bsky.social and I said last week proper reform is needed to make commitments to fix parly relationships a reality

instituteforgovernment.org.ukFixing relations with MPs will require more than warm words from Andy Burnham | Institute for GovernmentAndy Burnham should be prepared to redistribute power in Parliament.
Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Chief Whip sets out that the PPS role is being reshaped, to have a higher profile, with more emphasis on parliamentary engagement on policy, and some media/public engagement too. x.com/labourwhips/...

Cath Haddon reposted

One question that’s come up a couple of times: where do Andy Burnham’s new cabinet represent as MPs? The north west has been the big gainer, with seven cabinet ministers holding seats there – of whom, five are in Greater Manchester

Cath Haddon reposted

Burnham’s cabinet is the first to achieve gender parity. And the Office for Equality and Opportunity will move to the MHCLG with Bridget Phillipson remaining in post as Minister for Women and Equalities. Here’s our IfG breakdown of what yesterday’s announcements mean for women in government … 🧵

Cath Haddon reposted

We are hiring! Brilliant senior job running our new UK Government team… …looking for someone creative and strategic with experience of government who would seize this fantastic opportunity to make government work well for the people of the UK! www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/about-us/car...

instituteforgovernment.org.ukDirector, UK Government | Institute for GovernmentA rare and exciting opportunity to become a core member of the Institute for Government’s newly restructured senior team.