Chris Colose

Chris Colose

@ccolose.bsky.social

Climate scientist. Interested in past, present, and future Earth and planetary climates.

654 followers110 following550 posts

Now…are there actual tipping points in the (modern) climate system?

Ruth Mottram@ruthmottram.eurosky.social

My ace colleague Shuting Yang presenting on climate change Tipping Points at the @dmidk.bsky.social NCKF Danish climate symposium this afternoon. Part of @tipesm.bsky.social work!

USAID, Ukrainians. There’s no limit to how many people he will kill in his relentless pursuit of power and wealth, and there’s still useful idiots who just see him as a cool visionary saving the future.

I’m not really a fan of “superhabitable” when we have a sample of one habitable world. But is the Eocene “more habitable” than modern because crocodilians can live at the poles? Maybe, but at the expense of other things, possibly less fun for mammals in the tropics www.nytimes.com/2026/10/13/s...

nytimes.comThere’s Worlds Out There More Habitable Than EarthScientists believe there are planets outside our solar system where life is even more abundant and sustainable.

Chris Colose reposted

Doing some orbital stuff, thought I'd make a plot integrating Earth's eccentricity forward 2 Myr removing individual planets (plot is of the e range). I'm close to Laskar's result for the standard case. Also General Relativity plays some role which Earth feels by affecting Mercury's precession rate.

Good paper (though the results have been shown before) with implications for weathering rates in hothouse climates to set the CO2 thermostat.

This post is unavailable.

Nice from @readfearn.bsky.social although maybe we can suggest better ways to avoid references to dry air “holding” vapor, like “warmer temperatures support more atmospheric water vapor." This always seems to read as less graceful, but Clausius-Clapeyron works without the non-condensing background.

Andrew Dessler@andrewdessler.com

Nice article by @readfearn.bsky.social about the Aug. 2026 record in atmospheric water vapor. My only criticism: they misspelled vapor throughout the article. Come on, guys, use a spellchecker next time. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Blue ice has come up a lot in the Paris paleo school and I’ve been hoping this whole time that something like this would come out soon!

One thing striking me so far (and I think there’s a U.S. vs European thing) is the fascination w tipping points in journalism discourse here. I think this is misguided for a few reasons. One is there’s no compelling evidence for big tipping points in the modern climate. There can be in certain 1/

Chris Colose@ccolose.bsky.social

For climate experts here: if you could ask questions to journalists on how they communicate on climate, what would they look like? (We’re actually doing this with real journalists and journalism students in Europe, so it might get passed on)

View full thread

Somewhat more forgivable but still irks me is increasing use of terms like “climate crisis” or “climate breakdown,” even among people I very much respect. It’s not that I can’t be convinced climate change isn’t a crisis, but it’s rather poorly formulated, not unlike “tipping points.” But for comm…

…does this even work? Does moving from a more precise term like “climate change” to “climate breakdown” actually incentivize action or changes in worldview? I haven’t seen evidence, and if anything it’s the wrong kind of anxiety (like questioning the ethics of having a kid).

One thing striking me so far (and I think there’s a U.S. vs European thing) is the fascination w tipping points in journalism discourse here. I think this is misguided for a few reasons. One is there’s no compelling evidence for big tipping points in the modern climate. There can be in certain 1/

Chris Colose@ccolose.bsky.social

For climate experts here: if you could ask questions to journalists on how they communicate on climate, what would they look like? (We’re actually doing this with real journalists and journalism students in Europe, so it might get passed on)

2/ tipping points in subsystems (a glacier, biology) but the bulk climate response is pretty linear. At the very least, centering tipping points is very inappropriate. But more importantly, it removes focus from very real threats of slow moving linear trends, and complacency when a threshold not hit

Chris Colose reposted

🧵CO₂ removal (CDR) is back in the news, but just because the UNEP report says we need CDR, it doesn't mean we'll have CDR. Many challenges will take decades of research and negotiation to solve. Here are some examples: Technological: We currently don't have any durable CDR method that scales.

For climate experts here: if you could ask questions to journalists on how they communicate on climate, what would they look like? (We’re actually doing this with real journalists and journalism students in Europe, so it might get passed on)

Great presentstions of student projects at the FuPa Cenozoic climate summer school in Paris. From EBMs (I was happy to help mentor on this) to Eocene crocodiles (I guess Crocodilia as a broader taxonomic category) as useful proxies for hothouse climate ranges.

New hypothesis for snowball bifurcations

Cristi Proistosescu@cristiproist.bsky.social

So how long until we hear the following argument? How can we trust climate models? They operate by integrating the Navier-Stokes equations, and we now know the Navier-Stokes equations blow up!

There’s no end to the tech tr(b)illionnaires dreams but it’s much easier to wade off fossil fuels, or e.g. invest in asteroid deflection, than declare mastery over the planet though half-brained geoengineering ideas.

Chris Colose reposted

The sheer scale of destruction amid Himalayan glacier collapse disaster is horrifying, as is presumptive human toll. This was no mere flash flood or mudslide--it was more akin to a geologic-scale debris avalanche or "inland tsunami." The footage emerging is almost unbelievable.

Has there been anything convincing that Common Era El Niño/La Nina tendencies have a substantial forced component? It matters for the future since muted E. pac warming biases sensitivity estimates low, but internal variability seems sufficient to explain that, e.g www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1...

pnas.orgMajor role for internal variability in tropical Pacific warming pattern over satellite era | PNASHome to El Niño, the tropical Pacific is a key player in the global climate system. While most of the planet has warmed during the satellite era of...
Michael E. Mann@michaelemann.bsky.social

"As super El Niño strengthens, study suggests that climate change is intensifying El Ninos" by @borenbears.bsky.social for @apnews.com [Important data & study; But like UNC's John Bruno, I disagree w/ the authors' interpretation of the data]: www.independent.co.uk/news/el-nino... 🧵

Chris Colose reposted

Stephen Kane@exocytherean.bsky.social

Turning a planet into Venus needs consideration of the whole planetary energy history. My new paper with Emma Miles discusses Venus analogs as an evolutionary energy-budget problem: tidal heating + pre-main-sequence irradiation can seal a planet's fate. arxiv.org/abs/2608.18290

In addition, probably worth revisiting the idea of screening climate models based on their sensitivity. In addition to aerosols, you also decouple sensitivity from historic warming based on things like the spatial pattern of warming.

ClimateBook@climatebook.bsky.social

This new paper is one of the better examples of teasing out the consequences of Earth's recent energy imbalance. scholar.google.com/citations?us... There has been a lot of confusion out there about what the energy imbalance means for climate, since most directly the energy imbalance is

With all the El Niño & global temperature discussions, while global temps are elevated (largely due to latent heating in the atmosphere) the ocean loses heat and Earth loses heat radiatively. The upcoming “mega” El Niño will be a good test case of the physics (and hopefully no more “pause” talk).

Chris Colose reposted

This is really alarming. www.theguardian.com/world/2026/a... Having evidently decided that a full-on military invasion of Greenland would rouse too much opposition, Trump's fossil fuel cronies are doing his dirty work for him, moving in on drilling in an environmentally protected area and daring

theguardian.comGreenland issues ‘strong warning’ as Trump-linked oil firm prepares to drillIsland’s government says no approval given after Greenland Energy brings kit ashore for exploratory drilling

At the end of the day, Covid was dangerous but effectively over, the vaccines worked, the world moved on, lessons learned, and the Weinstein-Rogan cranks & their solutions/vax critiques were intellectually bankrupt, but cost far more lives than personality defects in scientists emails.

Trump’s threat of tariffs against Canada for smoke “invasion” is stupid, but a good case study of how geopolitics will react to SRM deployment, when different countries/billionaires/trillionaires have varying levels of aerosol control (despite the fossil fuel invasion of everyone against everyone)

Temperatures in Canada are going up partly because of U.S. emissions, which are invading the entire globe.

Zeke Hausfather@zekehausfather.com

Canada's boreal forest is roughly the size of Europe (or 4.5x the size of Texas). Most fires are in remote areas far from habitation in that have never had a history of fire suppression or management. And the amount that is burning is directly linked to temperature and rainfall.

Climate Change as a Global Tea Party

David Ho@davidho.bsky.social

If almost every person on Earth did nothing but make cups of tea, day and night, one every second, and poured every single one into the ocean, that's how much heat the ocean is absorbing. This heat absorption, driven by our CO₂ emissions, causes sea level rise, marine heatwaves, and polar ice melt.

Finally went to trivia and the final big bonus point question was a planetary science question, although very badly phrased (which planet has 40 years of darkness and 40 years of sunlight). Nonetheless, the gift card to get more beer will be coming home to our team, despite my quick rant to the host

Sadly a lot of answers were in the inner solar system, which should have been ruled out from basic Kepler. I had to think about Neptune’s orbital period for a moment, but then I thought the host probably got the clumsy question from something about Uranus’ obliquity.

Everything in an authoritarian regime is fake. It hollows out competence & replaces it with loyalty, rewarding only willingness to echo pre-determined “truths.” Of course Matt is a fraud and troll, but none of that matters. He, like the DOE authors, are willing corrupted puppets.

This post is unavailable.