Christopher Terry

Christopher Terry

@christopherterry.bsky.social

University of Minnesota/HSJMC Associate Professor of Media Law. I teach folks about the 1st Amendment, @FCC, @FEC& @FTC policy for a living. Otherwise talking Brewer Baseball and Fishing. And yes, the hostile opinions re: FCC policy failures are mine.

4.5K followers651 following3.7K posts

2026 meets its version of Jews for Buchanan.

Adam Bonin@adambonin.bsky.social

The time to determine whether Dan J. Sullivan Jr. could appear on the Alaska ballot for U.S. Senate was months ago, and Alaska courts did so. What's additionally batshit about this is that the candidates' names are printed on the ballot in a way which makes abundantly clear who's who.

I think they're probably within the margin of error.

TheDesk.net@thedesk.net

A spokesperson for @freedom.press said its own unscientific poll "shows that 98 percent of the words that come out of Brendan Carr's mouth are unconstitutional bullshit." The organization did not release any information about its survey methodology.

Christopher Terry reposted

Replying to @marisakabas.bsky.social

Huge follow-up reporting to my scoop: The Guardian confirmed America Next—the conservative nonprofit founded by Bobby Jindal that was offering students $ to disrupt El-Sayed events—paid a firm registered to Tommy Teepell’s dad Timmy $250k for “canvassing and influencer marketing” against El-Sayed.

theguardian.comMichigan heckler the son of Republican adviser paid for ‘influencer marketing’ against El-SayedTimmy Teepell’s firm paid $250,000 by America Next, which has been trying to gin up ‘organic’ opposition to El-Sayed

Say it ain't so Mike! Next you'll be telling me the Fairness Doctrine would have kept Fox News balanced and that it guaranteed equal time.

Mike Masnick@masnick.com

Kind of stunned how many people in my mentions still believe that the point of Section 230 is that if you edit, you lose its protections. That's literally the exact opposite of why the law was written and the exact opposite of what courts have said. But tons of people here believe it. Weird.

I like this idea, it imagines a fantastic unicorns and rainbows kind of world where I can get students to read the syllabus, show up for class and or/do the readings.

Philip Gourevitch@pgourevitch.bsky.social

EDJ edit page continues its reality-defying streak decade after decade:

Remember when Levis thought the Dead Kennedy's Holiday in Cambodia would be a great tune to sell jeans?

Corey Rayburn Yung@coreyryung.bsky.social

Just saw a TV commercial from TIAA to the tune of Violent Femmes' "Blister in the Sun," a song about a guy who masturbates so much that it has made his girlfriend breakdown and cry. Sure, why not?

Christopher Terry reposted

The Supreme Court has blocked an appellate court's earlier order that would have forced the FCC to reconsider its March rule on political ad rates charged to radio and TV broadcasters, one that favors Republican campaigns and causes.

thedesk.netSupreme Court blocks order forcing FCC ruling on political ad rates | TheDesk.netThe Supreme Court said federal law requires the FCC to resolve administrative challenges but does not establish a specific deadline for doing so.

Christopher Terry reposted

I was thinking about the Andy Harris don't record me or else meltdown yesterday, and I realized the GOP has basically become cops. They don't like scrutiny, hate when they are questioned by little people, and respond with meaningless threats to people engaged in First Amendment protected activity.

He's probably still salty about the thing he did on CSPAN back in 2015.

This is exactly the kind of nerd talk I doom scroll social media for. No....seriously.

Orin Kerr@orinkerr.bsky.social

There are overtones re how to interpret the Stored Communications Act for multi-purpose providers in today's argument about the scope of the Video Privacy Protection Act, Salazar v. Paramount Global. Transcript: www.supremecourt.gov/oral_argumen... Audio: www.supremecourt.gov/oral_argumen...

Christopher Terry reposted

A federal appeals court on Wednesday allowed Florida to enforce a state law barring children under 14 from accessing social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok or Snapchat, rejecting tech industry groups' claims that the law violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections.

reut.rsFlorida can enforce state law barring young kids from social media, appeals court rulesA federal appeals court on Wednesday allowed Florida to enforce ​a state law barring children under 14 from accessing social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok or Snapchat, rejecting ‌tech industry groups' claims that the law violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections.