Dan Farbman

Dan Farbman

@danfarbman.bsky.social

Law Professor at BC Law, Historian of social movements and local government. Writing a book about Abolitionist Lawyering.

8.6K followers788 following548 posts

This is very interesting and very well reported. It rhymes with this thing I just wrote about reclaiming pragmatism from reactionary centrists. postcardsofthehanging.substack.com/p/radical-pr...

postcardsofthehanging.substack.comRadical PragmatismGeniuses with Backpacks
Assigned Media@assignedmedia.org

Democrats seem headed for big wins, but one avenue for self-sabotage would be adopting R's framing on trans rights. @billiejsweeney.bsky.social spoke with insiders incl Lanae Erikson of Third Way and Rep. Sarah McBride for this substanial piece of new reporting. assignedmedia.org/breaking-new...

This is bleak and funny at the same time. But I admit that my first thought upon seeing the picture was: why have they charred all of the Caps For Sale man's caps?

The Washington Post@washingtonpost.com

The owner of a top BBQ joint in Texas decided to cut brisket, the top-selling item, from the menu rather than institute a $10 markup for customers. The decision was fueled not just by the skyrocketing price of brisket but by inflation.

Honestly, Trump’s predilection for sleeping in public is one the most relatable things about him.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Trump's face droops while he attends the 9/11 ceremony this morning at the Pentagon (Finn Gomez/Getty)

The most bizarre part of this post is the claim that “few Republicans in 1865 would refute this.” It seems obviously wrong to me, unless you are only looking at moderates. But worse, it conflates the Republican Party with abolition, which is also obviously wrong.

Pat Sobkowski@patsobkowski.com

Okay. I very much look forward to reading this paper and/or hearing the lecture if it’s recorded.

This is an amazing project. Read it now!

Sandeep@sandeepinbk.bsky.social

New draft paper from me up on ssrn: ‘THE LEGAL REALISM OF W.E.B. DU BOIS’ - tracing Du Bois’s underexamined legal thought, from his 1896 dissertation on the slave trade through to his and the NAACP’s 1947 Appeal to the World papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Currently writing about political realignment in the 1840s and 50s. And boy does this ever feel familiar.

This chart is so satisfying. Cherry on top of these last two months of unexpectedly amazing Boston baseball pleasure.

Stats@redsoxstats.bsky.social

The Red Sox 31-5 run started with a 4-game sweep of the Yankees, and over this timeframe, the Yankees offense has been the worst in MLB. There are some incredible dark arts at work here.

Took our 13 year old to her first proper fancy restaurant tonight. (Mooncusser in Boston—it’s so good). It was magical. Kids are the best. (And they also frequently suck.)

It’s never great when Justices pull a Bradwell and start talking about “the nature of things.” Tends to age poorly.

Jay Willis@jaywillis.net

Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion in the trans sports ban case in West Virginia contains some of the ugliest transphobic stuff I have ever seen in a legal opinion. Straight-up gleeful. Vile man. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

Governance by Skynard.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

JD Vance: "I think Nixon's historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance, and deservedly so. I joked that if Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be like a 12 hours news story. The idea that it took down a presidency is crazy."

Just to be very clear, SFFA did not overrule the line of cases that allow for policies like this or the 10% plan in Texas. The DOJ is free to argue whatever it wants, and god knows that SCOTUS could well accept DOJ's arguments. But this interpretation of SFFA is entrepenurial (and also very bad).

Bill@bill-of-lefts.bsky.social

Reverse disparate impact is such a fucking evil policy. The justice department’s position is that you can’t do class-based affirmative action because Black people tend to be poorer, so this would unfairly benefit Black people. Just resegregation. thecollegeinvestor.com/82214/doj-fi...

Having loved the Knicks as a kid, and having fallen hard out of love with them since the departure of Anthony Mason, I was seduced and started watching in game 3. At halftime yesterday I became convinced that me watching was the problem so I went to bed. Seems I was right.

It's become common for (Parents Involved, SFFA) the conservative justices wax sanctimonious about how colorblindness is the true meaning of Brown...and how their opponents are making segregationist arguments. And yet, the actual neo-segregationists keep winning. Whoops?

"Political parties are colorblind" is a wild thing to say (and a wilder thing to believe) in the context of...all of American history.

Joey Fishkin@fishkin.bsky.social

It gets a little more wild each time they say it. So if every single Black person votes one way, and every single white person votes the opposite way, every election, that's not even RELEVANT to whether voting is "racially polarized"—as long as this durable disagreement is organized into 'parties.'

If you want to read about the difference between town and county visions of localism check out my latest: Towns or Counties, hot of the pdf press at the Indiana Law Review. Come for the cool old maps, stay for the local government law history. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

papers.ssrn.comTowns or CountiesThe United States is a nation of counties with a latent romance for towns. The development of American local government law from the arrival of the first Europe