David Wearing

David Wearing

@davidwearing.bsky.social

Assistant Professor in International Relations at the University of Sussex (own views, obviously). Interested in British (and Western) foreign relations in the Middle East and elsewhere, and how they're shaped by legacies of colonialism.

9.4K followers2.4K following2.2K posts

David Wearing reposted

"...there is no significant divide ... in Israel when it comes to the Palestinians, but rather many shades of right ...Eisenkot has not charted a significantly different path here than ... Netanyahu; he, too, has said he rejects Palestinian statehood". www.nytimes.com/2026/10/24/o...

nytimes.comOpinion | What the Israeli Election Won’t ChangeIsraelis will decide this week if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will remain in office.

David Wearing reposted

Just the sort of mature, thoughtful content one would expect from the people who coined the term "anti-bedtime left".

The Economist@economist.com

The chancellor resembles a hapless coach at a football club whose megalomaniac chairman picks the team each week. How long can this “bald fraud” prosper? bit.ly/4icXOm1 Illustration: Nate Kitch

"the decision by almost all opposition parties to refuse a coalition with Arab parties means they are almost as unlikely to form a government as Netanyahu ...[they have] effectively excluded Palestinian citizens as legitimate partners in the political process"

Just the sort of mature, thoughtful content one would expect from the people who coined the term "anti-bedtime left".

The Economist@economist.com

The chancellor resembles a hapless coach at a football club whose megalomaniac chairman picks the team each week. How long can this “bald fraud” prosper? bit.ly/4icXOm1 Illustration: Nate Kitch

This will be excellent 👇🏽 Janey knows her stuff

Janey Starling@janeystarling.bsky.social

🚨BIG NEWS: I am delighted to announce that my first book, PUNISHING WOMEN: The Case Against Prison will be published by Granta Books in February 2027.   You can pre-order here: www.waterstones.com/book/punishi...

The UK does need a DSA-style Green Party. But it's difficult to see how this sort of vacuous, performative machismo is going to make that happen.

Saul Staniforth@saulstaniforth.bsky.social

Ashok Kumar is asked, "What's the strategy the Greens for Palestine have, & where does this motion sit within it?" Watch the full @novaramedia.com interview here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqEj...

Remember the centrists doing their little victory dance around this? Turns out that decades of indulging "legitimate concerns", punctuated by occasional bouts of tutting at the overt far right, does more to strengthen the far right than weaken it. Who could have guessed? (Many of us).

Josh Self@josh.politics.co.uk

#Onthisday 2009. Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party (BNP), appeared as a panellist on Question Time The BBC's decision to invite Griffin was immensely controversial. His appearance drew a record audience of eight million viewers Full story: www.politics.co.uk/history/bnp-...

David Wearing reposted

Gleeful displays of cruelty and dominance are dictionary-definition evil. What you're looking at here is precisely what that word is for. Call this movement what it is, and treat it as such.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

JD Vance: "When you're mean to Amy Acton, she sics the American media and of course the Democrat Party operatives all across the state of Ohio after you. But I think a person who is more worried about whether somebody says something mean about them, that person can never serve in the gov's mansion"

Gleeful displays of cruelty and dominance are dictionary-definition evil. What you're looking at here is precisely what that word is for. Call this movement what it is, and treat it as such.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

JD Vance: "When you're mean to Amy Acton, she sics the American media and of course the Democrat Party operatives all across the state of Ohio after you. But I think a person who is more worried about whether somebody says something mean about them, that person can never serve in the gov's mansion"

Breaking: Working class increasingly out of touch with "The Working Class"

Greg Sargent@gregsargent.bsky.social

Really striking stuff from new NYT poll: Dems lead GOP on every major issue, including immigration, and are seen as the party of the working class by a 13-point margin:

Robin Cook's "ethical dimension" to UK foreign policy famously crashed and burned against the real, enduring nature of British power in the world system (and of the Blair project). Miliband's attempt at an ethical foreign policy risks dying an even quicker death that Cook's.

Whatever the Greens' problems, limitations and missteps, they will still pose a threat to Labour in so far as it is in Labour's nature to make the sort of decisions that gift voters to the Greens, on these and other issues, e.g..... bsky.app/profile/aure...

Aurelien Mondon@aurelmondon.com

This is not about "climate campaigners" and framing it this way is totally ridiculous This is a blow to the planet and us all

Diplomacy is urgently required to de-escalate both this war and the ongoing war in the Gulf started by the UK's leading ally, the US. British involvement in these intertwined wars merely serves to sustain them and the resulting global economic crisis. Yet British diplomacy is nowhere to be seen.

There is a real mindlessness evident in Britain's reflexive provision of military support to every ally who demands it, no matter how destructive or criminal that ally's behaviour. It is deeply unethical, it may well give rise to criminal liability, and clearly it can also be bad politics.

There are no "good guys" here. Both Houthis and Saudis have a long record of targeting civilians. The UK claims its involvement will be purely "defensive", but such operations inescapably free up Saudi capacity to carry out offensive operations in Yemen (likely carried out with UK supplied weapons).

Clearly Burnham & Miliband understand that UK complicity in Gaza helped sink Keir Starmer's premiership. They have worked to win back voters lost over that issue. Now, Burnham risks being complicit in Saudi violations of international law, just like so many of his predecessors in Downing Street.

The Saudis tried bombing the Houthis into submission between 2015 and 2022, to no avail. Twenty-five years of war with various Yemeni and international parties has only made the group stronger. There is a clear danger now of Britain involving itself in another open-ended conflict in the Middle East.

Vulgar economism has really undermined a lot of people's analytical capabilities. Humans are not narrow economic utility maximisers. Our motivating interests are far broader. Our subjectivities and senses of self & others are real & important. There's no analytical shortcut around this complexity.

This post is unavailable.

The new militarism, and its accompanying discourse of national virility, is capable of taking us to a very dark place indeed.

Saul Staniforth@saulstaniforth.bsky.social

Interviewing a govt minister Hazarika shows a graph comparing young people claiming PIP to the size of our armed forces & declares it "tells a story about modern Britain" I can't even make a sarcastic comment about our fearless fourth estate, because Hazarika is a Labour politician

David Wearing reposted

We will have more transformational politicians and fewer conformist politicians to the extent that political campaigning is treated as a pedagogical exercise rather than a marketing exercise.

Charlotte Lydia Riley@lottelydia.bsky.social

I didn’t know much about about Abdul El-Sayed before watching this but I knew as soon as I’d seen it that he’d worked as a teacher — and sure enough he was an assistant professor in epidemiology. This is how you walk a student through a dumb take.

Very proud to be a Fellow of this important organisation taking on the emerging pro-militarist consensus.

Transition Security Project@transitionsec.bsky.social

One year ago, @cmmonwealth.bsky.social and @cplusc.bsky.social founded Transition Security Project to investigate the UK & US military industrial complexes — and understand how they threaten our economies, climate and global safety. Here’s what we’ve been up to since then 🧵

Translation to English: Farage worked to suppress the most blatant expressions of racism in his movement so as to more effectively pursue a politics of substantive racial demagoguery. Classic decontamination strategy of the c21st Western far right. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

theguardian.comJenrick claims Farage has done more to stand against racism than ‘almost anybody’Reform MP defends leader after ITV footage shows official warning Farage he is ‘protecting’ candidate over racist David Lammy comments

Undercover journalists have unmasked shocking racism in the "hordes of men of colour are coming to molest our womenfolk" party.

Athena Kugblenu@athenakugblenu.bsky.social

the joke is you don't need to go undercover. Frank Drebin could find racists in Reform lol

"Hiding their true beliefs" behind a laughably thin veneer of deniability. Anyone prepared to engage their critical faculties for 5 seconds could see through it. But we were consistently shut down with demands that "legitimate concerns" be "respected". And now we're supposed to be shocked.

Saul Staniforth@saulstaniforth.bsky.social

"Good morning Britain. Exposed, Reforms racist & sexist politicians hiding their true beliefs from voters.. a warning that many of the comments caught on camera you'll find shocking & abhorrent" #GMB

If you establish and entrench a consensus that (a) hostility to migrants is a cri du coeur from the authentic working class, and (b) anti racism is the preserve of out of touch metropolitan liberals, where do you suppose the country will end up? www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

theguardian.comRightwing extremists increasingly likely to consider terrorist attacks, MI5 chief saysMove from anti-immigration or anti-Muslim views to violence is ‘most marked trend’ in spy agency’s caseload over last year
View full thread

I know I say it a lot, but it needs saying, and I will continue to say it until there is a real reckoning. The Legitimate Concerns paradigm has been one of the biggest public policy disasters of the c21st in the UK. And we certainly haven't paid the full cost of it yet.

Many, many, many people peddled this reckless, ignorant foolishness. And even with the far right wolves now very much at the door, I don't think I've seen a single one of them express so much as an ounce of contrition. This is a problem for the health of our public discourse and our democracy

If you establish and entrench a consensus that (a) hostility to migrants is a cri du coeur from the authentic working class, and (b) anti racism is the preserve of out of touch metropolitan liberals, where do you suppose the country will end up? www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

theguardian.comRightwing extremists increasingly likely to consider terrorist attacks, MI5 chief saysMove from anti-immigration or anti-Muslim views to violence is ‘most marked trend’ in spy agency’s caseload over last year

Anyone with a basic knowledge of history and a scrap of common sense could have told you that - given the inherently dehumanising nature of racism and xenophobia - the end point could only be violence. State violence and street violence.

Largely, it will not be the members of the political class who played with this fire - thinking themselves very clever and strategic - who will end up getting burned.

Almost 30 years ago I was appalled at how the New Labour government was indulging and validating the right wing moral panic against asylum seekers. And every year since then I've seen my fears about where that would lead prove entirely well founded. The "legitimate concerns" debacle continues.

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Robert Jenrick for Reform says that Royal Marines using "lethal force" on small boats could end it in days. "Deploy the Royal Marines into the Channel. If they need to use lethal force then they'll be able to do so. I think the problem would come to an end within a matter of days."

A fair chunk of this expenditure goes to the US and UK to purchase major weapons systems, which the Saudis then use to e.g. pulverise Yemeni civilians from the skies for years on end. All that money never made Yemenis more secure, and hasn't made Saudis more secure either. Might be a lesson there.

Duncan Weldon@duncanweldon.bsky.social

Saudi Arabia spends about $80bn annually on defence.

Big win for the performatively serious "defence" (military) hawks. We're prolonging our reliance on fossil fuels to own...Russia? And we're dialling back efforts to tackle what is plainly our no1 security risk measured by severity and likelihood of impact, i.e. the climate crisis.

Caroline Lucas@carolinelucas.bsky.social

This would be economically illiterate & environmentally disastrous - and makes us less secure: undermining efforts to reduce energy bills by reducing dependence on gas, increasing vulnerability to global dictators, driving climate emissions & knee capping a market that’s just beginning to take off

I thought it was a core principle of Western liberalism (e.g. US Declaration of Independence) that it is people that have inalienable rights, not states or system of governance. And if a system of governance denies or violates people's rights, the people have the right to change it.

Priyamvada Gopal@priyamvadagopal.bsky.social

Let me make this easy. No nation-state, including my own natal land, has the right to exist based on religious or racial requirements for belonging, by dispossessing or excluding others, or having different classes of citizenship.

Another dimension of this: the Gaza genocide can only be properly and fully understood as a joint venture between the far right Netanyahu government and its centrist enablers in Washington, primarily, but also in London, Berlin and elsewhere.

Guardian US@us.theguardian.com

"Many people prefer to believe the brutes and the sadists are responsible, largely because they are not like 'us,'" writes @omerbartov.bsky.social. "But modern genocide is the product of the technocrats, bureaucrats and cold planners of extermination, who don’t get their hands dirty."

I'm a Fellow of @transitionsec.bsky.social and I strongly endorse this analysis. There's a lot of performative Seriousness from pundits and politicians on military spending. It's time we had a genuinely serious conversation around these issues, and I hope this new report can help to stimulate one.

Transition Security Project@transitionsec.bsky.social

NEW: Keir Starmer declared last year that the “peace dividend” was over, promoting the myth that Britain’s military spending has declined since the end of the Cold War.   Our latest report shows this simply isn’t true. 🧵

My experience of the left over 25 years? It's a fringe (albeit a loud one) that's indulgent of e.g. Hamas. For most of us, we focus on the UK & its allies because that's what we can affect with our work. We see condemnations of actors who are bad, but whose actions we can't affect, as mere posturing

Alexander Clarkson@aphclarkson.bsky.social

That substantial portions of the European and US Left struggle with the idea that it is possible to condemn criminal actions by the Israeli government while also condemning the vicious brutality of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime continues to baffle me.

I will say this. My own experience of the left is more day-to-day and face-to-face others' experience might be. If your primary experience of the left is via social media etc I can see why a different view might be taken. But social media brings out the belligerent and the obtuse in all of us.