Djordje Sredanovic

Djordje Sredanovic

@djsredanovic.bsky.social

Sociologist - citizenship/Brexit/migration/media/race&ethnicity/work Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Chester/collaborateur scientifique at GERME laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles

776 followers454 following310 posts

I have been thinking for some time that Mahmood is un-re-electable in Ladywood, but I am sure there are people in Birmingham who have a better understanding. She could always parachute elsewhere.

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

A small feature of Electoral Calculus MRP poll (Labour 353 seats, Conservative 90, Reform 81, LibDems 70, SNP 28, Plaid 5, Greens 4) is that Greens only projected at four seats but shown gaining Home Secretary's Birmingham Ladywood constituency. www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/blogs/ec_vip...

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

The UK government is making upwards of £4.9bn in profit from visa fees, citizenship fees & the immigration health surcharge. Meanwhile, people are getting into thousands of pounds of debt or going without food just to afford to these immigration fees. www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2026...

thebureauinvestigates.comGovernment makes £5bn a year from immigration fees while applicants…Home Office’s fees are up to 10 times the processing cost – and rising every year

Quirk of citizenship/immigration legislation interactions: descendants of Italian citizens are citizens even before registering as such, but the UK Home Office has been denying Settled Status unless registration was completed

Adrian Berry KC@berryadrianc.bsky.social

Italian citizenship by descent and Brexit rights under the Withdrawal Agreement: Home Office error as to foreign nationality law #ItalianCitizenship #WithdrawalAgreement #UKImmigrationPolicy #NationalityLaw See here: tinyurl.com/4ju5x5rb

From a quick look at the report there are some very shareable points and one idea that is widespread but has created quite a few problems in the UK and elsewhere.

🚨 NEW REPORT: UK citizenship fees are more than 5x the cost of processing an application. We need a system that’s more accessible and does more to build participation, integration and belonging. Our new report sets out how 🔗 www.ippr.org/publications/from-strangers-to-citizens

View full thread

From a quick look at the report there are some very shareable points and one idea that is widespread but has created quite a few problems in the UK and elsewhere.

🚨 NEW REPORT: UK citizenship fees are more than 5x the cost of processing an application. We need a system that’s more accessible and does more to build participation, integration and belonging. Our new report sets out how 🔗 www.ippr.org/publications/from-strangers-to-citizens

View full thread

3b) The test should not focus on history trivia but on aspects of civic participation - this seems a roll back to the first version of the Life in the UK test introduced by Labour, and I do not have much against it

3c) There should be a citizenship course for applicants. There is in other countries, and, apart from the cost, when compulsory it does more to create issues of attendance, compliance, and how to teach citizenship meaningfully, rather than actually teaching citizenship.

From a quick look at the report there are some very shareable points and one idea that is widespread but has created quite a few problems in the UK and elsewhere.

🚨 NEW REPORT: UK citizenship fees are more than 5x the cost of processing an application. We need a system that’s more accessible and does more to build participation, integration and belonging. Our new report sets out how 🔗 www.ippr.org/publications/from-strangers-to-citizens

View full thread

2) Path to citizenship should be clear, 5 years (actually 6 at the moment given the 1 year to wait after settlement) usually, 10 exceptionally - this sounds basically support of the status quo against Mahmood's plan, and cannot be but welcome

3) The naturalisation process should foster integration - this has been a mantra since the 2000s, but there is plenty of literature showing that it creates problems. It makes access to rights conditional to vague 'integration' criteria which will exclude some and usually do not reach a clear aim.

From a quick look at the report there are some very shareable points and one idea that is widespread but has created quite a few problems in the UK and elsewhere.

🚨 NEW REPORT: UK citizenship fees are more than 5x the cost of processing an application. We need a system that’s more accessible and does more to build participation, integration and belonging. Our new report sets out how 🔗 www.ippr.org/publications/from-strangers-to-citizens

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

Sponsors will no longer need to report modern slavery referrals to the Home Office, and Erasmus+ mobility is back in the immigration rules. We've broken down all the key changes in HC 584, including what's actually shifting for sponsors and applicants in practice.

freemovement.org.ukStatement of changes HC 584: sponsorship rules eased for modern slavery victims and return of Erasmus+ - Free MovementThe latest statement of changes stop skilled worker visa holders who are recognised victims of modern slavery from being tied to their sponsors.

Don't know if it is my favourite, but 'Scottish lad tries working in real estate, then returns to previous activities'

Neill Cameron@neillcameron.bsky.social

Make your favorite film sound as boring as possible without giving away the title: Humphrey Bogart reluctantly gets involved in the admin regarding an associate’s immigration issues.

Among the many problems of both this letter and Mahmood's plans, there is the talk of settlement being 'automatic' after five years. Settlement requires a complex application, an English language test or alternative evidence, and the Life in the UK test. That's not automatic.

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social

In case there was any doubt. Restricting access to benefits isn't enough for Conservatives/Badenoch. They want to deport/"remigrate" people who came here on legal work visas, not because of (debunked) claims about benefits/fiscal costs but because they've embraced an openly ethnonationalist agenda

It's July and late in the working day, but has anyone explicitly contrasted habitus and intersectionality? Both account for how complex social positions structure in an embodied way experiences and outlooks.

But while intersectionality is about things one is (which can involve some rigidity, and calls for the concept of privilege) habitus is ultimately about things one has or had (forms of capital) which allows some gradation, and allows to see phenomena more specifically in terms of inequality.

Yes, the two concepts are often used together, and a lot of the points of intersectional theory were absolutely absent in Bourdieu. But I wonder whether rethinking some central points of intersectionality in terms of forms of capital could open new avenues of analysis.

Periodical reminder that 1) the UK government made all the decisions behind the Windrush situation 2) Mahmood either lacks or pretends to lack the historical and policy knowledge that would be required for the position she holds.

Simon Cox@simonfrcox.bsky.social

It is NOT a “loophole” that Commonwealth citizens who have been permanent UK residents since before 1973 cannot be deported. It was Parliament’s deliberate decision in the 1971 Immigration Act. It is based on hundreds of years of free movement between the Commonwealth/Empire, abolished in 1973.

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

Having graduated from a university system (Italy) with multiple exam sessions, attempts allowed, and possibility to advance to the next year with a minimum of credits cleared, teaching in the UK system of 'you get one shot and then you're capped at 40' is hard to stomach.

Jill Rutter@jillongovt.bsky.social

am going to try my policy reform. @samfr.bsky.social can tell me why its a bad idea. This is as someone who was v good at school and uni exams but failed their driving test multiple times - but then passed. Our exam system suffers from conflating the need to rank with the need to show achievement.

If my count is up-to-date European countries without integrationist requirements are now sadly down to 2

Maarten Vink@maartenpvink.bsky.social

Sounds pretty scandalous. > tougher rules [on citizenship acquisition] will apply even to pending applications when they come into force on June 6th

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

I don't often shout at EU legal texts while reading them, but this opinion is, to use a legal term, utter fucking bullshit. (With great respect 😀) More precisely, it deals with two scenarios: being removed from Italy to Albania to be detained as either an irregular migrant or an asylum seeker. 1/

Steve Peers@stevepeers.bsky.social

CJEU, EU asylum law Advocate General's opinion: Italy/Albania deal is compatible with EU law as regards detention in Albania, as long as guarantees for migrants/asylum-seekers are upheld curia.europa.eu/site/jcms/d2...

View full thread

I argue that the cumulative effect of the changes in policy has not only transformed the migratory flows, but also created a not-fully-planned mix of legal statuses among the British population with migrant backgrounds

Djordje Sredanovic reposted

Long thread alert 🧵 1. Applying earned settlement rules retrospectively is wrong. But the proposal to extend the default settlement period to ten years for all future migrants is, in terms of long-term damage, an order of magnitude more serious. It has received far less attention than it deserves.