Pinned
Replying to @dustyschmidt.bsky.social
flooded.py def flooded(thought): while thought in ("high", "free", "there"): print(f"Thought I was {thought}") break flooded("high") flooded("free") flooded("there")
devine_dusty.py
@dustyschmidt.bsky.social
def flooded(): while True: print("ERROR: I was wrong.") print("FATAL: This changes everything.") print("WARNING: No state change detected.") print("INFO: Continuing anyway.") print()
422 followers1.4K following2.5K posts
Pinned
Replying to @dustyschmidt.bsky.social
flooded.py def flooded(thought): while thought in ("high", "free", "there"): print(f"Thought I was {thought}") break flooded("high") flooded("free") flooded("there")
devine_dusty.py reposted
devine_dusty.py reposted
Replying to @dollspace.gay
On October 7, the Association for Human Mathematics declared: "Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done." Since when did mathematical discovery require permission from mathematicians? Theres the gatekeeping hubris right there. You arent in the club, your work doesnt count.
I remember when a comically exaggerated rate of trans kids was self reported, and mainstream outlets were confused about that one too.
Young teenagers are less likely to identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual than a few years ago, according to a new analysis. “It really does look like a free fall,” Jean Twenge, a professor of psychology, said. “But what’s causing it is unclear.”
dustyflooded.py def flooded(): while True: think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think() think()
flooded.py def flooded(thought): while thought in ("high", "free", "there"): print(f"Thought I was {thought}") break flooded("high") flooded("free") flooded("there")
devine_dusty.py reposted
devine_dusty.py reposted
devine_dusty.py reposted
devine_dusty.py reposted
Again: what we’re doing here is defining “understanding” as “the thing that humans do.” If a model is accurately absorbing new information, solving unsolved problems of incredible difficulty, engaging in detailed back-and-forths, but is not “understanding,” the word “understanding” has no meaning.
In any case, your original claim that what an LLM does "requires comprehensive understanding" is demonstrably false because an LLM does not and cannot understand anything.