Shirley Siluk

Shirley Siluk

@ebishirl.bsky.social

Writer/editor and former journalist. Author of "News Speak: How Language Can Manipulate Meaning in What We Read, Watch and Listen to" and "Prove It!: Fact-Finding Secrets of a Fanatical Online Researcher."

3.4K followers7.2K following982 posts

Shirley Siluk reposted

We acknowledge that no one has the bandwidth for this, but if it helps: -It’s ‘sleight of hand’ -It’s ‘bated breath’ -It’s ‘lo and behold’ -It's 'buck naked' -It’s ‘brass tacks’ -It’s ‘free rein’ -It’s ‘toe the line'

Shirley Siluk reposted

Shirley Siluk reposted

Shirley Siluk reposted

Replying to @writingdisrupted.bsky.social

The whole piece is a must-read. And, as a footnote to the essay adds, "Part of this essay will be delivered as a lecture at The People’s AI Assembly on 19 October in New York City." That's tonight. You can sign up to join the livestream here: actionnetwork.org/forms/ai-now...

actionnetwork.orgJoin the People's AI Assembly in New York City on October 19This is a special event co-hosted by AI Now Institute and More Perfect Union.

Still a bit of time to sign up for tonight's livestream of the People's AI Assembly, organized by the AI Now Institute and the More Perfect Union. Featuring Bhairavi Desai, Ilana Glazer, Lorena Gonzalez, Karen Hao, Lina Khan, Naomi Klein, Grandell “Bird” Logan, KeShaun Pearson, and more.

Looks like I'm going to have to start adding a footnote to every one of my WordPress posts: "I used Bob, my 2018 Lenovo YOGA 730, to produce this story." (Note to publishers collaborating with tech bros: Stop anthropomorphizing algorithms, you credulous weirdos.)

This post is unavailable.

What a fascinating story - definitely worth reading from start to finish.

The Public Domain Review@publicdomainrev.bsky.social

1943–5, with the help of Warner Bros.' finest, the U.S. Army produced a series of 27 propaganda cartoons depicting the calamitous adventures of Private Snafu. @Mark_D_Kaufman explores how one film inadvertently let slip one of the war's greatest secrets: publicdomainreview.org/essay/i...

AI's not the main topic of this research, but it comes up. Fortunately, the study finds that most people don't consider AI chatbots to be a top source of news.

Writing Disrupted@writingdisrupted.bsky.social

Research from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism finds that people are adopting a more diverse and layered view of news to "navigate an increasingly complex information environment”: greenforlife-eivwu.wordpress.com/2026/09/16/i...

This is the article on AI I've been waiting a long time to read. I won't do it the disservice of providing a summary of excerpts - you really have to read the whole thing yourself. But I WILL provide a few especially pointed quotes that really resonated with me:

Eryk Salvaggio@eryk.bsky.social

“Nobody is losing control of an emerging intelligence. They’re redirecting their own agency to the thing they are building.” It’s a myth, a self-affirming form of sense making: they take the action to build it, but insist on describing it as if they are passive witnesses to an inevitable force.

View full thread

This is the article on AI I've been waiting a long time to read. I won't do it the disservice of providing a summary of excerpts - you really have to read the whole thing yourself. But I WILL provide a few especially pointed quotes that really resonated with me:

Eryk Salvaggio@eryk.bsky.social

“Nobody is losing control of an emerging intelligence. They’re redirecting their own agency to the thing they are building.” It’s a myth, a self-affirming form of sense making: they take the action to build it, but insist on describing it as if they are passive witnesses to an inevitable force.

On the whole "went rogue" coverage: "OpenAI developers optimized an LLM specifically for cybersecurity and coding and then ran it without security guardrails. So they trained a model to find exploits and then acted surprised that it found them."

"The “system from nowhere” framing overemphasizes the agency of the model... It muddies the line of accountability that leads to the people making choices about how models are built and deployed. It centers the model as if it "acts" and "learns" and "decides" without them..."

LOL... perfect response!

benjamin@benjamino.bsky.social

Hobbes and Shamshiri: In our podcast we invented If Books Could Kill as a cautionary tale Carroll: At long last, I have created the reading pile from classic podcast If Books Could Kill

I loved Emily Wilson's translation, LOVED Nolan's Odyssey and am thoroughly enjoying @gregpak.net's play-by-play of reading Wilson. Good fun! And spot-on analysis!

Greg Pak@gregpak.net

Okay, Emily Wilson, you pulled me in! I'm reading your translation of the ODYSSEY, first time I've read this poem since college. Let's see how it goes...

Shirley Siluk reposted

Feeling overwhelmed with all of this. LISTEN. Another Louisiana resident (Marshawn is the only name we have) testifies against the state’s racial gerrymander, speaking truth to power up and down the hearing room and predicts how this story will end. Speak your truth, fight and believe.

The "give-up machine" is such a great description of generative AI chatbots... most of all because it's true, as this recent study found: arxiv.org/abs/2604.04721

arxiv.orgAI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent PerformancePeople often optimize for long-term goals in collaboration: A mentor or companion doesn't just answer questions, but also scaffolds learning, tracks progress, and prioritizes the other person's growth...
Der Geisterfresser@lighter.bsky.social

Its kinda funny how the dumbest "idea guys" all decided to stop being idea guys when the give-up machine showed up and let them all use it for ideas instead

The study says about AI users: "People do not merely become worse at tasks, but they also stop trying. If such effects accumulate over months and years of AI use, we may end up creating a generation of learners who have lost the disposition to struggle productively without technological support."