Harry Metcalfe

Harry Metcalfe

@harrym.com

Entrepreneur, problem solver, technical person. Believer that tech can and should make things better. Erstwhile prodder of government. PhD dropout. Founder of dxw, advisor to Tradecraft. Quietly poly 🐦 harry_m on Mastodon.social.

366 followers138 following206 posts

[boomer-esque rant warning] There really is something about people outsourcing their responsibility to insurance companies "because of insurance reasons" that grinds my gears very loudly Don't blame the insurance monster, just own your decision

Just watched two founders on a panel, both who sell services to the NHS, both just answered a question about how to sell into the NHS by saying that it's too hard, and they shouldn't try. "Choose another vertical", one said. This makes me sad. If worked in the NHS it would be make me very sad.

Harry Metcalfe reposted

More pondering on AI as I wrangle with what it means for public servants... Here's where I've got to so far: There is a useful path to take between hype and doom. It's time to keep experimenting and learning as nobody knows what the future will bring. jasonkitcat.com/2026/03/02/s...

jasonkitcat.comSome thoughts on AI“Anyone who tries to tell us they know the future is simply trying to own it.” — Margaret Heffernan in her introduction to Uncharted Take a deep breath. Nobody knows what is going to happen with AI…

Harry Metcalfe reposted

Brilliant, geeky, healthy news... well done to @bengoldacre.bsky.social et al.

Ben Goldacre@bengoldacre.bsky.social

OpenSAFELY is open from today! Huge thanks to all who supported this vast collaboration: whole population GP data; in a productive platform; innovative privacy protections; unprecedented support from professions, privacy campaigners; &c Now it's over to users! www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/blog/2026/02...

How can it possibly be the case that a fresh Ubuntu install, in 2026, still doesn't understand what monitors I have and what resolutions they support? This was annoying and weird ten years ago

The lack of coverage on this story is surprising, but ho hum. TL;DR: the medics who broke windows at JP Morgan as part of a climate protest, and who suffered a mistrial two years ago, have just been retried and found unanimously not guilty. thedoctor.bma.org.uk/articles/hea...

thedoctor.bma.org.ukDoctors cleared of criminal damageSix healthcare workers, including four doctors, say their climate activism has been vindicated after being found not guilty of criminal damage for breaking glass windows at the offices of JP Morgan th...
View full thread

This feels like a case were the law doesn't really fit the situation to me: or at least one where professional obligations, legal obligations, realpolitik and personal principles all collided in a way that precludes there being an obvious ethical answer.

I'm not generally pro people wrecking shit to make political points, but I'm glad this lot got found not guilty. They seem like a good bunch. And they make a pretty compelling case that JP Morgan aren't, and that breaking a few windows was, in this context, fine. So good for them 👍

The lack of coverage on this story is surprising, but ho hum. TL;DR: the medics who broke windows at JP Morgan as part of a climate protest, and who suffered a mistrial two years ago, have just been retried and found unanimously not guilty. thedoctor.bma.org.uk/articles/hea...

thedoctor.bma.org.ukDoctors cleared of criminal damageSix healthcare workers, including four doctors, say their climate activism has been vindicated after being found not guilty of criminal damage for breaking glass windows at the offices of JP Morgan th...

Harry Metcalfe reposted

"The Ministry of Justice will deploy machine learning to identify at-risk children for early intervention and to help prevent them falling into a life of crime" <- focus on structures and causes, not individuals, and look deeper than just "data" [repeat forever] www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...

thetimes.comThe machines that will predict the criminals of the futureThe Ministry of Justice will deploy machine learning to identify at-risk children for early intervention and to help prevent them falling into a life of crime

Harry Metcalfe reposted

I’m pretty confident in calling this fake. The user who posted it seems to be part of a substantial network of accounts with similar usernames all posting and commenting on each other’s content. Ironically it’s a great example of an AI agent making stuff up to tell you what you want to hear

👇Just an hour left to go on this! Go on and pop a quick response in before bed. Every little helps.

Harry Metcalfe@harrym.com

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

gov.ukgov.uk
View full thread

Here's a word I don't use often: shameful. But this policy is shameful. I'm ashamed that my government has proposed it. It's arrogant, it's cruel, it won't work in any meaningful way, but it will make our country a worse place. Please respond (before midnight). It's so, so bad gov.uk/government/c...

gov.ukgov.uk

ETA: I forgot to mention one of the worst things - that it's retrospective, and will apply to people already here, already working towards settlement but not there yet. People who've moved here, put down roots - only to have this government yank them out. An extraordinary breach of faith. Awful.

Harry Metcalfe reposted

If you haven’t quite yet found the time to do this, please scrape together a few minutes this evening - the consultation closes just before midnight UK time. If time is tight, skip the 200-word open answers. Your votes on closed answers matter. www.gov.uk/government/c...

gov.ukEarned settlementThe government is consulting on how the current settlement system should be reformed and how those reforms should be implemented.
Harry Metcalfe@harrym.com

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

gov.ukgov.uk
View full thread

Instead we have one that starts from suspicion. Settlement should be a sensible process of integration that recognises a migrant's future as being here: but under this policy it's a hostile, exclusionary, decade-long++ trial. It presumes that a bureaucracy can judge who deserves to belong. It can't.

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

gov.ukgov.uk
View full thread

Across the whole thing, they mistake measurability for meaning. A person who's raised kids here, made friends, participated in local life is integrated whether or not they can pass a (fatuous) multiple choice exam. Real integration is lived and worked, but lived things don't fit on forms. Don't try!

And then there are the children. A child brought here at 3 whose parents face a 15-year wait could grow up entirely in this country and still face years of uncertainty about whether they can stay. Children don't choose to migrate. Treating such a child's belonging as provisional is terribly cruel.

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

gov.ukgov.uk
View full thread

The first pillar is "Character". But what the policy actually measures is criminal records, English, and earnings. Those are things you can observe: character is not. Character is morals, resilience, humaniness, the capacity for growth. The state cannot assess it and shouldn't pretend to try.

The word is revealing and it matters. If you tell people this is about "character" you're saying those who fail it are deficient as human beings. Not that they didn't meet a practical requirement: that they weren't a good enough person. Who do they think they are, to presume to say such a thing?

I've just responded to the Earned Settlement consultation. It closes tonight. The whole idea is dreadful but what stuck with me most is the gross arrogance of the whole exercise. A (cross) thread 🧵

gov.ukgov.uk

We begin with the Home Secretary's foreword, which is something else. She opens with her own family's migration story, declares herself a patriot, then lays out a system designed to keep people like her parents in constant limbo for a decade or more. The lack of self-awareness is kinda mindblowing.

Rather gratifying, mid-debug on an annoying problem and having asked Claude Code "Is this just stupid Windows bollocks" when it replied "Yes, this is just stupid Windows bollocks" (I have learned my lesson and moved to Ubuntu)

I don't think any TV people follow me except James, but if you're a TV person who isn't James, you should hire James and also watch his shows. He's rather good.

This post is unavailable.

AI code reviewer just told the other AI code reviewer, which is itself in another tab, that it was bikeshedding. Quietly amused

👏👏👏

Best for Britain@bestforbritain.org

SUPERB and angrily unvarnished response, by former BBC chairman, Lord Patten. "I don't think that we should allow ourselves to be bullied into thinking that the BBC is only any good, if it reflects the prejudice of the last person who shouted at it." ~AA